Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well it's apparent that if Hillary runs, her husbands sexual escapades with Monica Lewinsky will be brought up again. I haven't evaluated Rand Paul as a possible candidate but with this kind of attack on Hillary's husband, he might be gearing up for testing the waters for a possible run. So is Rand Paul and his wife right, is Bill Clinton a sexual predator?
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Sunday accused former President Clinton of “predatory” sexual behavior, saying he used the Oval Office to take advantage of Monica Lewinsky.
“I think, really, the media seems to have given President Clinton a pass on this,” Paul said on NBC’s "Meet the Press." “He took advantage of a girl that was 20 years old and an intern in his office. There is no excuse for that and that is predatory behavior and ... we shouldn’t want to associate with people who would take advantage of a young girl in his office.”
In an interview with Vogue magazine, Paul’s wife, Kelley, said Hillary Clinton’s potential presidential run could be derailed by her husband’s “predatory” behavior while in office.
“I would say his behavior was predatory, offensive to women,” she said.
he would be correct...bill Clinton is a sexual predator , sexual harasser , and sexual assaulter
*** FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE *** [RE: Presidential Election 2016]
Given our current lack of anything substantial to offer, let's bring up completely idiotic historic items.
We've decided this is the best tactic moving forward and will surely guarantee success in 2016.
For up to-the-minute talking points, consult Breitbart & Fox News.
That is all. We don't have a clue. Now. Or ever.
Well if you can bring up Hillary's husband than you can bring up Rand's drunk son.
Personally, I'd rather hang out with a horn dog than a violent drunk.
Personally I would avoid both. I have a wife and 2 daughters to think of. By all means bring up Rand's drunk son. But then that's me, I'm kind of selective about who I associate with. call me a snob, I kind of like being around people who understand concepts like Honor, Loyalty, integrity, and not attempt to peep on my wife and daughters. I also don't like sloppy, angry drunks.
Geez, ya'ed think that would make them more popular with the right with all their 'family values' people like Gingrich, Sanford, Haggard, et al.
In other words stereotypical politicians. We get what we accept. People keep making excuses for what our elected reps become more and more open and bold with.
Well the liberal media did give protection to Bill Clinton's exploitation of women. I guess Billy Boy running around on Hillary is ok with liberals though.
No, but his wife might be. His demonstrated behavior and the fact that he remains a public figure makes him fair game to discuss. He remains active politically, he uses his influence at Obama's beck and call.
Good point.
Rand's main point is that if the Democrats want to use the "war on women" meme, as they always do, Hillary's using it would make her look ridiculous and weak. And he's certainly right about that. What leg would Hillary have to stand on with that argument? Apparently, Bill has three. She could borrow one of his.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
