Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So Hillary's husband is a player and Ran Paul's son is a violent drunk
Which one is worse??
Nothing wrong with drunks as long as they are not stupid drunks
Well, I am not defending Paul's son, but the airline served an underage teen, What was Bill's excuse as a full grown adult male? I do agree though, that none of this should reflect on Hillary or Rand.
They didn't just protect Bill. The Democrats and the media actively trashed women who had been violated by Bill. Clinton paid Paula Jones $850,000 for sexually harassing her. And she's just one of a long line of women who have accused Clinton of harassment/assault. And I'm sure the way those who came forward were completely trashed scared others away from telling their story.
The irony of the Dems screaming "War on Women" while the stalwarts of their party have been a Senator who murdered a mistress and a President who is a serial sexual harasser.
It doesnt take a genuis to figured out who "outted" Herman Cain. It was far more advantageous for a (R) to have done so durring the primaries.
Agreed. I voted for the guy twice, but I don't want him back in the White House. He disgraced the office and brought shame on his family.
I do have to wonder if Rand Paul is as pure as snow, however. I suspect his morality is selectively applied.
He brought shame with women before he got to the White House but the D's overlook it. However, let's not make Hillary a saint because she stood by her man.
I voted for Rand's father twice because I agreed with his views, and because he stayed away from the mud slinging.
No thanks to Rand I have seen enough mud slinging.
From the article---
Quote:
However, Paul said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shouldn’t be
judged by her husband’s actions, and it likely wouldn’t be an issue if she
decides to run for president in 2016.
“But, I think, it is a factor in judging Bill Clinton in history,” he
said.
However, Paul said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shouldn’t be
judged by her husband’s actions, and it likely wouldn’t be an issue if she
decides to run for president in 2016.
“But, I think, it is a factor in judging Bill Clinton in history,” he
said.
Gee, Im running for president, Hillary is running for president...but me brining up Bill has nothing to do with 2016. Gee whiz.
Bill Clinton is in increasingly poor health, thus improving his sympathetic victim cred
Bill Clinton is increasingly involved charities related to health and wellness, thus improving his nice guy cred.
Bill Clinton is shockingly affable in the face of insults, thus evoking memories of Obama v McCain in 2nd and 3rd debate of 2008.
The media is still in love with Bill Clinton
So if Paul follows this tactic all the way, it's his Waterloo. The media will terrorize him for picking on the saintly Bill Clinton and by extension, his remarkable, strong, resilient wife who stuck by him during even the worst trials and tribualtions blah blah. If he goes negative vs the Clintons, he loses, and he loses huge.
Whoever is Rand Paul's chief strategist should be advising him to run against the status quo of big government that BOTH PARTIES are guilty of that hasn't gotten us anywhere. If he said in a debate "you know, my opponent keeps bringing the failure of one or more Republican policies...and she's right, they've failed just as badly as the Democrat version of the same plan that is only marginally different, but just as foolhardy. What I am proposing is smaller, more streamline dgovernment that neither party seems to embrace, even after their policies have failed for 50 years." It brings you back to the real problem, gets out of a trench war with the Clintons that you will never win, and gives independents and centrists hope that maybe finally someone gets it.
But if he keeps mudslinging, he's going down and down hard.
Gee, Im running for president, Hillary is running for president...but me brining up Bill has nothing to do with 2016. Gee whiz.
I don't know that he volunteered the info and blurted it out, it probably some how was asked to him by someone. I would love to know how Bill Clinton came up in the conversation, but the way the news media twists everything who knows what went on.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I do agree though, that none of this should reflect on Hillary or Rand.
I have seen enough mud slinging.
