Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-06-2014, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
What good is a store known for great, fresh food moving into your neighborhood if said store moving in prices you out of the neighborhood?
Trader Joe's wasn't going to gentrify anything because the neighborhood gentrified a long time ago. A New Seasons just opened up down the road from this location.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2014, 11:53 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29289
is it ok for nicer areas to fight to keep the 'oppressed population' out?

imagine a group sending a letter to the city saying they would "remain opposed to any development in N/NE Portland that does not primarily benefit the White community."

how well would that have gone over?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Metro DC area
4,520 posts, read 4,209,259 times
Reputation: 1289
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post
I agree you don't know what gentrification is.

Also, how in the world did you see any "racism" in ChocLot's post?

What she stated was true, many times lower income people work to improve their neighborhoods then a "cool" "hip" store or business moves in and it attracts people who are higher income. They move in and increase the desirability of a neighborhood and property taxes increase which force out the lower income people who actually made the neighborhood desirable in the first place.

FWIW, many poor white people have been affected by gentrification as have Asians and Hispanics and just about everyone. It is not a white/black thing like you seem to think it is or falsely assume that ChocLot thinks it is.
Wish I could rep you again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
is it ok for nicer areas to fight to keep the 'oppressed population' out?

imagine a group sending a letter to the city saying they would "remain opposed to any development in N/NE Portland that does not primarily benefit the White community."

how well would that have gone over?
It would have probably gone over poorly. But then again, I am happy this project got shot down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:00 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,555,075 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
It would have probably gone over poorly. But then again, I am happy this project got shot down.
damn straight it would have. the shrieks of 'racism!!!' would be reverberating for weeks.
you don't find it interesting that a mirror image of that statement substituting the word 'black' got no reaction at all?

what about the other question? is it ok for wealthier areas to try to keep the 'oppressed population' [their phrase, not mine] out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:02 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,670,550 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocLot View Post
That's what folks seem to be missing. They wonder why some blacks don't welcome an improvement in their neighborhoods while ignoring the fact that the improvement usually comes at a cost of having to move and never enjoying that new and improved neighborhood!
Except in this case, that's ridiculous, because Trader Joe's is not expensive. It's relatively cheap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Metro DC area
4,520 posts, read 4,209,259 times
Reputation: 1289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
Except in this case, that's ridiculous, because Trader Joe's is not expensive. It's relatively cheap.
The cost I'm speaking of is not in reference to TJ's groceries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
damn straight it would have. the shrieks of 'racism!!!' would be reverberating for weeks.
you don't find it interesting that a mirror image of that statement substituting the word 'black' got no reaction at all?

what about the other question? is it ok for wealthier areas to try to keep the 'oppressed population' [their phrase, not mine] out?
Who cares, it was a bad development for an inner city neighborhood in Portland. I think the idea that this Trader Joe's was gonna force out the black community is just idiotic, but if it played a part in canceling this project, then I am cool with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
damn straight it would have. the shrieks of 'racism!!!' would be reverberating for weeks.
you don't find it interesting that a mirror image of that statement substituting the word 'black' got no reaction at all?

what about the other question? is it ok for wealthier areas to try to keep the 'oppressed population' [their phrase, not mine] out?
Of course it is. NIMBY is alive and well.
I've seen "potential traffic problems" and "overcrowded schools" used as the excuse.
Those are PC acceptable at city council meetings on "affordable housing" issues and where to build.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:05 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,670,550 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocLot View Post
The cost I'm speaking of is not in reference to TJ's groceries.
You said:

Quote:
the fact that the improvement usually comes at a cost of having to move and never enjoying that new and improved neighborhood!
So what cost are you talking about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top