Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:04 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,545,982 times
Reputation: 6392

Advertisements

This is how the future will look across the US in a decade or so.

The upper and lower classes hate the middle class and are in the process of destroying them. At some point, the rich will tire of paying for everything to keep the 'useless eaters' alive.They will use their global warming religion to rationalize culling the population. I give it 15 years max.

Have a nice life, Millenials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:04 AM
 
1,855 posts, read 3,610,446 times
Reputation: 2151
The true decline of California dates from Howard Jarvis and Proposition 13. The Golden State has never recovered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,180,231 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
The true decline of California dates from Howard Jarvis and Proposition 13. The Golden State has never recovered.
I think Prop 13 is bad for California. But you should blame the reason for Prop 13's existence, not Prop 13 itself. California's abuse of property taxes led to Prop 13. The solution was wrong. And it will likely forever tie the hands of CA legislators. But they caused the problem in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:30 AM
 
2,776 posts, read 3,595,964 times
Reputation: 2312
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
Since when do conservatives care about income inequality?
Since when am I a conservative?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:34 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,037,809 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
And -- let me guess -- the solution is to reduce taxes on the rich (of whom California has an enormous abundance) and increase them on the poor. To you cons, the real problem with income inequality is that there isn't enough of it.
Actually, the real solution is for liberals like yourself to stop passing legislation that creates more poor people and keeps already poor people poor indefinitely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:36 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,037,809 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoutboy View Post
The true decline of California dates from Howard Jarvis and Proposition 13. The Golden State has never recovered.
Right, because letting people keep more of their hard earned money is always a bad thing in the eyes of liberals with spending on the brain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Idaho
6,357 posts, read 7,770,912 times
Reputation: 14188
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
I think Prop 13 is bad for California. But you should blame the reason for Prop 13's existence, not Prop 13 itself. California's abuse of property taxes led to Prop 13. The solution was wrong. And it will likely forever tie the hands of CA legislators. But they caused the problem in the first place.
Well stated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 11:16 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,463,986 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Actually, the real solution is for liberals like yourself to stop passing legislation that creates more poor people and keeps already poor people poor indefinitely.
And which legislation would that be?

You cons are the ones who want to cut benefits, freeze wages, and increase taxes on the poor. How does that help them exactly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 11:17 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,463,986 times
Reputation: 5752
Meanwhile...

Wall Street Journal: $2 Million+ Homes Going Like Hotcakes in California

If only there were some way to take some of that wealth and spread it around a little. But of course that would involve "unfair" levels of taxation on the .01% -- excuse me, I mean "job creators."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2014, 11:20 AM
 
1,855 posts, read 3,610,446 times
Reputation: 2151
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
And which legislation would that be?

You cons are the ones who want to cut benefits, freeze wages, and increase taxes on the poor. How does that help them exactly?
It teaches them self-reliancy! Just another second or third minimum wage job with no benefits is all it will take! Geez...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top