Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When Megan Kelly questioned Professor Turley what could be done, Im suprised he did not tell Megan that it is up to the congress, not the courts, to bring action against the President's actions.
The Senate wasted no time in challenging President Obama's "recess" appointments filing suit in Federal court.
When Megan Kelly questioned Professor Turley what could be done, Im suprised he did not tell Megan that it is up to the congress, not the courts, to bring action against the President's actions.
The Senate wasted no time in challenging President Obama's "recess" appointments filing suit in Federal court.
If the Congress does not act, then that is on them.
My understanding is ,, Congress has no 'standing' to challenge because they are not 'harmed' by what he is doing.
(I disagree because he is usurping their authority)
It is said that an individual or business can file suit because of the randomly applied laws.
The King picks and chooses his friends and enemies and then (penalizes or rewards) , with law as he sees fit.
Liberals will rue the day when their slavish devotion to one President comes back to bite them in the rear end.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.