Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,807,239 times
Reputation: 10789

Advertisements

Married people in bad marriages will no longer have to worry about losing their health insurance and will have more freedom to divorce their spouses now thanks to the ACA.

Same goes for those caught up in jobs they do not like. This is what freedom is about folks; the ability to leave an unhappy situation.

Quote:
Word is starting to spread among family law attorneys that in the post-ACA era, health insurance isn't the binder it once was for holding bad marriages together.

With more options available on the market and preexisting conditions no longer an issue, people once reluctant to divorce for fear of losing health insurance coverage would do well to reconsider.

Read more at Insurance no longer may hinder divorce

 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
I've heard of marriages staying together for the kids but this is the first time hearing that marriages are staying together for "the health insurance".
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,000,767 times
Reputation: 6128
That freedom was already available without the unconstitutional, anti-liberty Obamacare act.

Aren't you dizzy from spinning?
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Part of getting a divorce is the judge deciding financial matters.
I guess these women didn't realize a judge could have done that all along in a divorce settlement ?
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:54 AM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,669,373 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I've heard of marriages staying together for the kids but this is the first time hearing that marriages are staying together for "the health insurance".
And because you've never heard of it, that means it does not exist. Unhappy spouses stay in marriages for financial reasons. Insurance is a financial reason.
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
And because you've never heard of it, that means it does not exist. Unhappy spouses stay in marriages for financial reasons. Insurance is a financial reason.
And going to court has a judge settling them.
Never heard of alimony ?
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:56 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,541,469 times
Reputation: 6392
Bots are so funny.
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:57 AM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,669,373 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And going to court has a judge settling them.
Never heard of alimony ?
Not even the point of the thread.
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:58 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,675,329 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Married people in bad marriages will no longer have to worry about losing their health insurance and will have more freedom to divorce their spouses now thanks to the ACA.

Same goes for those caught up in jobs they do not like. This is what freedom is about folks; the ability to leave an unhappy situation.

Read more at Insurance no longer may hinder divorce
Food Stamps, WIC, Welfare, HUD assistance, Medicaid.... finally, a modern day liberal, feminist woman can fulfill her dream of being barefoot and pregnant raising children from multiple fathers, while taking up her dream of painting and poetry without a worry on her mind.

Liberal Utopia.

Or the woman could have had the hubby sign a prenuptial agreement to supply her with health care, and alimony, and child care, and a house, and...
 
Old 03-03-2014, 10:59 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,724,715 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
And because you've never heard of it, that means it does not exist. Unhappy spouses stay in marriages for financial reasons. Insurance is a financial reason.
It is part of the divorce agreement. Woman don't stay in an abusive marriage because of health insurance. Besides if the husband is on welfare and on medicaid it isn't an issue.

Nice try OP.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top