Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
March. 24 (UPI) -- A bill proposed in Massachusetts would prevent divorcing parents from getting busy in their bedrooms at home until they've handled their business in court.
Sen. Richard J. Ross of Wrentham proposed legislation, Bill 787, that would prohibit the divorcing parent from having sex in their home until all legal proceedings are finished.
March. 24 (UPI) -- A bill proposed in Massachusetts would prevent divorcing parents from getting busy in their bedrooms at home until they've handled their business in court.
Sen. Richard J. Ross of Wrentham proposed legislation, Bill 787, that would prohibit the divorcing parent from having sex in their home until all legal proceedings are finished.
The Senator doesn't support the bill. He presented the legislation at the request of one of his constituents, and it was written by that constituent. Massachusetts law allows legislators to introduce constituent-initiated legislation to the legislature for consideration.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 26 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,571 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
The Senator doesn't support the bill. He presented the legislation at the request of one of his constituents, and it was written by that constituent. Massachusetts law allows legislators to introduce constituent-initiated legislation to the legislature for consideration.
glad someone else read the article. it also has no penalty, and will likely be voted down anyways.
The Senator doesn't support the bill. He presented the legislation at the request of one of his constituents, and it was written by that constituent. Massachusetts law allows legislators to introduce constituent-initiated legislation to the legislature for consideration.
So he's purposefully wasting the taxpayers money and the legislature's time by presenting a bill even he will vote against? That doesn't make it any better. Wonder how much money the constituent gave his campaign to get him to pull this silly stunt.
So he's purposefully wasting the taxpayers money and the legislature's time by presenting a bill even he will vote against? That doesn't make it any better. Wonder how much money the constituent gave his campaign to get him to pull this silly stunt.
Its how government operates, don't question it, you may be considered a terrorist.
So he's purposefully wasting the taxpayers money and the legislature's time by presenting a bill even he will vote against? That doesn't make it any better. Wonder how much money the constituent gave his campaign to get him to pull this silly stunt.
A TAXPAYER wanted the legislature to consider this proposal. The law in Massachusetts gives TAXPAYERS a direct route to the legislature. I don't think that's a waste of time or money.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
