Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So what the difference between her being a gun owner and carrying at work VS the armed security officer being present in the bank?
I am going to go with the permission of the bank on that one. You do understand the idea of getting permission right? Especially as it relates to bringing stuff onto someone else's property.
But he CAN forbid her entrance to the property. Her, or anyone else, for any reason. If he doesn't want people carrying guns on his property, he can tell them to leave.
Which is exactly what he did.
The bank violated no one's 2nd amendment rights. Note that she still has her gun.
BTW, I think the bank would be better off if they allowed law-abiding people to carry concealed inside the bank. But that's their choice to make.
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,861,253 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dissenter
Pretty sure bringing a weapon onto your workplace's property, no matter what state you are in, will get you fired pretty quickly.
Not at my current work place it is up to me if I want to carry concealed, (where it's not prohibited). We even have a firearm in our survival gear.
Nor the one before. In fact where I worked before it we were encouraged to carry a firearm if we wanted to and provided firearm training if we wanted it.
I do not work in law enforcement or security.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.