Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
... to nominate this young attractive woman to replace Sebelius, with the thinking that the Republicans will attack her and resist, giving them another "war on women" claim, then Republicans should just let her sail through unopposed. Only the obligatory kind of questioning, and then give her a pass. Smooth sailing!
Republicans are going to oppose every single thing Obama does. Do you think a woman is going to stop that? O could resurrect Jesus and name him vice president and congress would filibuster it.
Republicans are going to oppose every single thing Obama does. Do you think a woman is going to stop that? O could resurrect Jesus and name him vice president and congress would filibuster it.
Yes they oppose destruction and nonsense ... I guess you dont like that?
my only question is why would he want to appoint Sylvia Mathews Burwell who has ben the director of the OPM (and is qualified to be that , being a financial services expert) to the director of HEALTH
my only question is why would he want to appoint Sylvia Mathews Burwell who has ben the director of the OPM (and is qualified to be that , being a financial services expert) to the director of HEALTH
she has zero health or medical background
Hey, that didn't stop anyone in this administration yet.
... to nominate this young attractive woman to replace Sebelius, with the thinking that the Republicans will attack her and resist, giving them another "war on women" claim, then Republicans should just let her sail through unopposed. Only the obligatory kind of questioning, and then give her a pass. Smooth sailing!
After all, she can't be any worse than Sebelius.
No - play it straight. They are there to represent their constituents - not play political gotcha games.
... to nominate this young attractive woman to replace Sebelius, with the thinking that the Republicans will attack her and resist, giving them another "war on women" claim, then Republicans should just let her sail through unopposed. Only the obligatory kind of questioning, and then give her a pass. Smooth sailing!
After all, she can't be any worse than Sebelius.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smalltownblues
Young and attractive? Dude, you need to get your eyes checked.
No kidding. I wonder if she got the Fox News treatment and came out a blonde with new teeth if she would pass muster with the Republicans.
No kidding. I wonder if she got the Fox News treatment and came out a blonde with new teeth if she would pass muster with the Republicans.
I dunno, but I bet she would pass muster with Bill Clinton.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
