Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am looking forward to your posting of the returns and the errors you claim are there.
All wait.
I'm sorry, but if you won't accept the findings of the GAO, why on earth would I waste my time presenting you with my own findings about the tax returns? You'd just find a reason to reject those as well.
Plus, as I said, I am not an accountant. I am not qualified to analyze corporate tax returns. I doubt you are, either.
You are just playing games here. You know I am right, but don't want to admit it. So, you raise the bar of proof you'll accept to a level you know I cannot reach, then sit back smugly and claim victory. If that kind of bait-and-switch makes you feel like you've achieved victory, you're welcome to it. But anyone looking at this exchange can plainly see you're back-peddling.
I'm sorry, but if you won't accept the findings of the GAO, why on earth would I waste my time presenting you with my own findings about the tax returns? You'd just find a reason to reject those as well.
Plus, as I said, I am not an accountant. I am not qualified to analyze corporate tax returns. I doubt you are, either.
You are just playing games here. You know I am right, but don't want to admit it. So, you raise the bar of proof you'll accept to a level you know I cannot reach, then sit back smugly and claim victory. If that kind of bait-and-switch makes you feel like you've achieved victory, you're welcome to it. But anyone looking at this exchange can plainly see you're back-peddling.
Yes, it is very high, although many exceptions have been lobbied into the tax code to get breaks for the bigger corporations, and some smaller ones too. The current admin has made multiple proposals to cut the tax rate while reducing the loop-holes and subsidies, but the GOP Congress refuses to move forward with it. Ironically the very same idea was promoted by Mitt Romney, and gained wide support from GOP, and ironically the GOP has said on multiple occasions that the rate should be lowered and subsidies should be cut, so their refusal to move forward highlights the partisan attitude in DC today.
It is done on the same forms as all other business.
Are you being deliberately obtuse or do you just have no idea what you are talking about? What does the form have to do with different rebates and credits being available to different industries?
Are you being deliberately obtuse or do you just have no idea what you are talking about? What does the form have to do with different rebates and credits being available to different industries?
Is this entire dog and pony show you are playing to prove some point? The EFFECTIVE rate many US companies pay is much less than the actual rate. The EFFECTIVE rate is based on adjusted income.
You're not winning the argument by playing little games, you know.
Is this entire dog and pony show you are playing to prove some point? The EFFECTIVE rate many US companies pay is much less than the actual rate. The EFFECTIVE rate is based on adjusted income.
You're not winning the argument by playing little games, you know.
Now you moved the goal post.
Effective is after the schedules and credit forms....the rate still has not changed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
