Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2014, 08:36 PM
 
1,143 posts, read 1,081,055 times
Reputation: 722

Advertisements

Obama keeping his promise to transform America into a socialist basket case.

7 million have left workforce since Obama took office.

Sessions: 7 Million Have Left Workforce Since Obama Took Office | The Weekly Standard
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2014, 08:38 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,736,042 times
Reputation: 22474
And with Obama's promises of amnesty and no more deportation of foreigners pouring over the border, there will be millions more unemployed joining these.

Obama is doing absolutely nothing to bring jobs to Americans -- he's opened the borders to all takers -- he's actually promising illegal foreigners the jobs and/or welfare handouts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2014, 08:53 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,467,970 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
And with Obama's promises of amnesty and no more deportation of foreigners pouring over the border, there will be millions more unemployed joining these.

Obama is doing absolutely nothing to bring jobs to Americans -- he's opened the borders to all takers -- he's actually promising illegal foreigners the jobs and/or welfare handouts.
Of course he is. It's millions more people to vote Democrat. It is readily apparent that Democrats care more about votes than about the economy. I don't think it is that they truly don't care about jobs, I think it's more that they are simply economically ignorant. It permeates everything they do - the increased regulations, the increased minimum wage, the pushing to tax the rich more, etc. Liberal philosophy is simply at odds with sound economic policy. I think they really believe that getting all these new voters in for their party will be absolutely fine. So what if they are on welfare? Just tax a few more billionaires to pay for the welfare payments. No problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 12:32 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,760,015 times
Reputation: 13868
crickets,

no worries, an election is around the corner, he'll start talking about jobs again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 01:00 AM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,912,624 times
Reputation: 3497
FACT: The labor participation rate is about the same as when Reagan took office.

FACT: The main thing driving the lower labor participation rate is that baby boomers are retiring and thus exiting the labor market.

You can try to pretend that baby boomers getting old and retiring is a partisan thing but the reality is it would be happening no matter which party is in power. The labor participation rate has been decline since the year 2000. We knew this was coming for decades, there is a demographic bulge which is entering their retirement years, Bush Sr was talking about it coming way back in the early 1990's and it finally hit us. It's just a mathematical reality and no amount of stupid partisan games will change it. The only way to make the old folks keep working is if they're so financially insecure they feel they have to but I, for one, am happy that the elderly can retire with dignity. I guess that's just me though judging by the posts of the right wing nutjobs.


Last edited by Think4Yourself; 06-07-2014 at 01:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 01:43 AM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,392,167 times
Reputation: 17261
Actually I'm surprised it's this high, in all honesty 12 years from now I bet it's 30% lower. No matter who is in charge.

As for retirements pulling people out of the labor force, I'm not sure I buy that completely, 67-63 is just too great of a drop.

Automations going to be the real employment killer eventually
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 01:53 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 28 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,564,108 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99 View Post
Obama's Roaring Economy: 92,009,000 Americans Not Working Labor Force At 36 Year Low
damned new born babies being all lazy and #*^%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 02:00 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,250,702 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
FACT: The labor participation rate is about the same as when Reagan took office.

Reagan won because the economy sucked at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 02:24 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 28 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,564,108 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Reagan won because the economy sucked at the time.
Which doesnt change the fact that the recession didnt start until after reagan took office and that the economy continued to be sluggish under his Presidency.

The difference between back then and today is that Democrats actually worked with Reagan as opposed to Republican plotting against President Obama on inauguration night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2014, 02:38 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,250,702 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Which doesnt change the fact that the recession didnt start until after reagan took office and that the economy continued to be sluggish under his Presidency.
Until of course it wasn't. Dealing with the fall out of 20% interest rates take time.

Quote:
The difference between back then and today is that Democrats actually worked with Reagan as opposed to Republican plotting against President Obama on inauguration night.
They fought him all the way. The difference is Reagan was popular. Obama got is stimulus package. He squandered it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top