Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Democrats oppose changing the 2008 Deportation Law which would enable a quick resolution to the border crisis. Looks like the Dems want to keep their future voters in the country on your dime.
Democrats oppose changing the 2008 Deportation Law which would enable a quick resolution to the border crisis. Looks like the Dems want to keep their future voters in the country on your dime.
Very good, and congratulation for providing a link to back up your claim. However, it also proves Bohner's claim is just Rhetoric. This is taken directly from the article.
White House deputy press secretary, told reporters, “I’m not sure what the speaker’s referring to.” He added, “We want to work with Democrats and Republicans to make sure those changes are done in the right way” and that there are resources to deal with the border crisis.
This means the Whitehouse is standing by it's word to support change.
Very good, and congratulation for providing a link to back up your claim. However, it also proves Bohner's claim is just Rhetoric. This is taken directly from the article.
White House deputy press secretary, told reporters, “I’m not sure what the speaker’s referring to.” He added, “We want to work with Democrats and Republicans to make sure those changes are done in the right way” and that there are resources to deal with the border crisis.
This means the Whitehouse is standing by it's word to support change.
Boehner's claim is rhetoric, but the white house is to be taken at their word? Got it.
Very good, and congratulation for providing a link to back up your claim. However, it also proves Bohner's claim is just Rhetoric. This is taken directly from the article.
White House deputy press secretary, told reporters, “I’m not sure what the speaker’s referring to.” He added, “We want to work with Democrats and Republicans to make sure those changes are done in the right way” and that there are resources to deal with the border crisis.
This means the Whitehouse is standing by it's word to support change.
But the Democrat Senators OPPOSE changing the law. Give ALL the facts please.
Boehner & Co. are mouthing the words, but in reality, they do not want to give Obama anything at all before the elections fearing he might look good. Yes--they are that political and self-centered.
Boehner & Co. are mouthing the words, but in reality, they do not want to give Obama anything at all before the elections fearing he might look good. Yes--they are that political and self-centered.
Of course the Republicans aren't going to give Obama political talking points right before the election. Why should they cede an election, this is still a two party state.
likewise, Obama isn't going to give the GOP anything at all.
Of course the Republicans aren't going to give Obama political talking points right before the election. Why should they cede an election, this is still a two party state.
likewise, Obama isn't going to give the GOP anything at all.
So what you're saying is a very serious problem goes unresolved because the politicians who have the authority to do something about it care more about getting their selves re-elected than they do about doing the job we elected them to do. No doubt that is the case, and is exactly why very few people in this country have any faith left in their government. I certainly don't.
Very good, and congratulation for providing a link to back up your claim. However, it also proves Bohner's claim is just Rhetoric. This is taken directly from the article.
White House deputy press secretary, told reporters, “I’m not sure what the speaker’s referring to.” He added, “We want to work with Democrats and Republicans to make sure those changes are done in the right way” and that there are resources to deal with the border crisis.
This means the Whitehouse is standing by it's word to support change.
It takes two lines of gobbledygook to say we support change? No they don't. They want to dilute the electorate in their favor. Simple as that.
If Obama is backing Bohner he's is supporting him, and Bohners claim that he isn't is the Rhetoric. Obama can only advise Democratic senators.
Why do you continue to disrespect the manufacturer of the vehicle that helped us in war? Do you spit on soldiers too?
BTW, Bush did sign the original version that should be amended.
Were you not so quick to jump in and defend your hero but take the time to actually read my OP, you would find my OP plainly stated that it was the Democrats who opposed the change. My Op made absolutely no mention of your shinning star.
This looks like someone is turning their head to these illegals so the democraphics can be changed. BOTH parties need to put politics aside and stop this! I think Americans need to clean house in Washington and send them all packing and get people in that will fight for WE the people and not be fighting for their re-election.
I'm not being political, I am saying throw all the bums out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.