Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually it's not. This would apply to any crime and the propensity of the public to declare some people guilty while others are given the benefit of a doubt. Why does one person get a pass while the other gets hung when the legal system hadn't charged either one of them? If there's not enough evidence to charge, why does anyone think the court of public opinion has a clue? In either case or any case in that matter. This is not a question of whether or not rape is worse murder. It's a question of whether the public has the right to declare anyone guilty when they have not even been charged with a crime. This is a very valid question.
Again, the OP can correct me if I'm interpreting this wrong.
Again, you're mixing the two cases, one already went through the Court with a dismissal as a results, the Cosby case has not been brought to justice yet, so these 2 cases have no similarities whatsoever, you just making up things, that's all.
If he did attack Wilson wouldnt they have DNA proof???? If Mike Brown allegedly reached for Wilsons gun wouldn't they check for Mike finger prints??? Shouldn't they check for Mike DNA in the car since that's where he allegedly "attacked Darren Wilson"? Something doesn't add up to me but oh well the grand jury let the murderer with a badge go free.
As for Bill Cosby situation, I'm not so sure it happened. If he did rape those random women, why they waited all these years to speak out? A person with common sense would report someone right away when he or she just got raped by someone else. I think those women waited until he got too old trying to blackmail him for loads of money.
NEWSFLASH!!! They DO have DNA PROOF. Browns fingerprints were on Wilson's gun and bloody mucous inside the police car and on Wilson's uniform!
Wake up and inform yourself! You are woefully and embarrassingly uninformed!
You're mixing 2 different cases, the first person is accused of murder and who happened to be an official representative of the state, the other case is a civilian accused of rape ,not murder ?
So if you're trying to equate the 2, then you're plain wrong.
Oh brother. I'm not even going to respond to this idiocy.
Ok, so on one hand you have a dead bullet-ridden body. On the other hand you have fame grabber and attention-seeking ex-model Janice Dickinson making claims from 30 years ago. Sure--same thing.
NEWSFLASH!!! They DO have DNA PROOF. Browns fingerprints were on Wilson's gun and bloody mucous inside the police car and on Wilson's uniform!
Wake up and inform yourself! You are woefully and embarrassingly uninformed!
They didn't get prints from the gun. Not sure why when one of his big points for seeing him as a threat was that he got a hold of his gun. I swear in the beginning he said that he went for his gun but that could have been poor wording from news outlets during the initial reports. His testimony on the stand was that Brown actually had his gun in control during the altercation.
i wonder if cosby fingerprint was on that ol model breast
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
