Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2015, 10:39 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,561 posts, read 17,232,713 times
Reputation: 17603

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
How is fair treatment considered "punishment"?
"Fair' is a meaningless term, given life only to benefit the user.

"Fair' is a four letter F word, a crutch with a cracked leg and loose bolts.

It is only fair that the ends justify the means. It's only fair Susie gets a cookie because Johnny stole one when mommy wasn't looking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2015, 10:49 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,621,539 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
How is fair treatment considered "punishment"?
Simple, you're penalizing one person because you do not like the outcome.

It's like having a race. Since one kid is faster than the others and always win, you attach weights to his legs to give the others a chance to catch him. You are punishing the fast kid.

Sure, the fast kid was out training with his father while the other kids were eating Cheatos while playing X-box, but that doesn't matter. The important thing is that nobody is a lot more successful than the others. We need the results to be "fair".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,180,231 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Explain why the hell financial speculation (which produces NOTHING) deserves favorable tax rates compared to earned income.
Do you think long term capital gains are speculation? I don't.

Short term capital gains generally produce liquidity. That generates economic activity, which most people think is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:08 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,406,698 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
"Fair' is a meaningless term, given life only to benefit the user.

"Fair' is a four letter F word, a crutch with a cracked leg and loose bolts.

It is only fair that the ends justify the means. It's only fair Susie gets a cookie because Johnny stole one when mommy wasn't looking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Simple, you're penalizing one person because you do not like the outcome.

It's like having a race. Since one kid is faster than the others and always win, you attach weights to his legs to give the others a chance to catch him. You are punishing the fast kid.

Sure, the fast kid was out training with his father while the other kids were eating Cheatos while playing X-box, but that doesn't matter. The important thing is that nobody is a lot more successful than the others. We need the results to be "fair".
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
Do you think long term capital gains are speculation? I don't.

Short term capital gains generally produce liquidity. That generates economic activity, which most people think is a good thing.
My challenge to all of you was crystal clear.

Explain why investors deserve preferential treatment over everyone else. I see no numerical evidence to support any of your claims... just whining about rich guys potentially losing money while engaging in speculation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:11 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
the alternative is burying the money in your backyard. doing that, instead of investing, would certainly bring things to a halt. We need to encourage more investment as it grows the economy.
Burying it in the backyard is the alternative and its not going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:48 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
That's the claim. Where is the empirical evidence?
A game you have tried ANY times, and lost. You post something ridiculous then when challenged you want them to prove you are wrong.

Sorry, won't work.

YOU made the claim, "Explain why the hell financial speculation (which produces NOTHING) so it is up to YOU to PROVE YOUR claim
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 11:51 AM
 
59,088 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
My challenge to all of you was crystal clear.

Explain why investors deserve preferential treatment over everyone else. I see no numerical evidence to support any of your claims... just whining about rich guys potentially losing money while engaging in speculation.
How many times and in how many ways does it need explaining?

Apparently you don't comprehend what has been told to you.

Not OUR problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 12:56 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,406,698 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
A game you have tried ANY times, and lost. You post something ridiculous then when challenged you want them to prove you are wrong.

Sorry, won't work.

YOU made the claim, "Explain why the hell financial speculation (which produces NOTHING) so it is up to YOU to PROVE YOUR claim
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
How many times and in how many ways does it need explaining?

Apparently you don't comprehend what has been told to you.

Not OUR problem.
Like I said, provide some evidence.

The claim was made that investment income needs favorable tax rates. That is what we are told. I asked you to provide evidence to prove such. Taxes do not prohibit people from investing, nor have they ever. The burden of proof is on you, partner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,366,904 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
When was this?
During the Clinton and Bush years, just like the newsman said in the vid. If you have info that the newsman is wrong post it,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2015, 01:19 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,528,561 times
Reputation: 2052
Here's a chart: Historical Capital Gains and Taxes

There doesn't appear to be any correlation between investment and tax rates. Investors look to general economic conditions in assessing risk, not tax rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top