Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And I don't want a single penny of mine to go to you. Stay off MY interstate! That's MY money. LOL. You're a hoot.
I don't think you're getting my point. I'm saying the first lady doesn't need to be shelling out OUR money so she can have "helpers". Roads are necessary it's one of the few things I don't mind my tax dollars goin towards.
I dont care what any first lady does, just so long as they do it on their dime.
Michelle Obama produces nothing of value (neither does her husband, but thats been covered in countless other threads).
I dont care what any first lady does, just so long as they do it on their dime.
Michelle Obama produces nothing of value (neither does her husband, but thats been covered in countless other threads).
Well write your Congressman because that is just how it has always been regardless of who is president.
I dont care what any first lady does, just so long as they do it on their dime.
Michelle Obama produces nothing of value (neither does her husband, but thats been covered in countless other threads).
What have other First Ladies produced of value? "Just say no"? $200,000+ for new White House china?
Did you rail against them as well, or have you just singled out this particular First Lady?
The size of the First Lady's staff has been debated for decades. Seems 22-24 has been the norm for decades.
Reports vary depending on the angle of the story, job title, physical location and so on.
There were reports about Nancy Reagan that included the entire domestic staff of the White House and the permanent staff at their ranch where Reagan conducted business most of the time.
Numbers also vary by the number physically located in the East Wing versus elsewhere in and outside the White House.
Tina Tchen , a former partner at a law firm, serves as Assistant to POTUS, Chief of Staff to the First Lady and Executive Director of White House Council on Women and Girls ( whatever that is). Easy enough to count this White House staffer 3x.
I don't care if it's a D or and R, that staff needs cut PERIOD.
This p*** me off. Americans bust their asses to support their families and it would help them tremendously to keep more of the money they earn but politicians are always complaining they need us to pay more taxes. This is just wrong, very very very wrong.
I don't care if it's a D or and R, that staff needs cut PERIOD.
This p*** me off. Americans bust their asses to support their families and it would help them tremendously to keep more of the money they earn but politicians are always complaining they need us to pay more taxes. This is just wrong, very very very wrong.
Alrighty then. Let me know of the next president wannabe who campaigns on cutting White House staff to the bone.
I prefer to focus on the big spends.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think you're getting my point. I'm saying the first lady doesn't need to be shelling out OUR money so she can have "helpers". Roads are necessary it's one of the few things I don't mind my tax dollars goin towards.
