Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2015, 03:21 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,587,085 times
Reputation: 2823

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
She should pull a Jed Bartlett and just show up and demand to testify to an open committee. Then lets see Gowdy and clan squirm to try and make this seem like anything other than a politically motivated witchhunt.
You think Gowdy is the one that wants to avoid an open exchange?

Last edited by Rggr; 05-22-2015 at 03:37 PM..

 
Old 05-22-2015, 03:34 PM
 
2,861 posts, read 3,851,677 times
Reputation: 2351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Great. Would love to hear some answers from her on her "foundation" while were at it. That should be interesting. While were at it, maybe she can tell us more about how poor she is, was or whatever she was claiming before. Poor poor Hillary.....

Besides power, does anyone even know what she stands for and believes in? Her campaign just seems so odd as does her past. It seems like she's running because she thinks its entitled to her, like shes next in line or something. You hear from liberals and the silly college kids and even rappers, about how great she is and how much they like her, yet not many can even explain why they feel that way. At least with Obama, whether they admitted it or not we knew it was because he was black and gave good speeches. But with her....it just boggles the mind. They're voting for a name, nothing more.
...uh, and she's a woman
 
Old 05-22-2015, 03:41 PM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,520,506 times
Reputation: 3261
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimazee View Post
...uh, and she's a woman
Do we actually know that for certain? Because she's no lady.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 03:42 PM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,095,872 times
Reputation: 1632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
You think Gowdy is the one that wants to avoid an open exchange?
Yes, exactly. Hillary has offered to testify (again) in an open session. Gowdy continues to drag his feet...the closer to 2016 the better. He and his committee are a huge fraud, spending taxpayer money to campaign against Hillary.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 03:57 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,587,085 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
Yes, exactly. Hillary has offered to testify (again) in an open session. Gowdy continues to drag his feet...the closer to 2016 the better. He and his committee are a huge fraud, spending taxpayer money to campaign against Hillary.
Either you're intentionally leaving out a lot of information to twist it or you just lack a lot of information. Gowdy wants the have the complete record of the correspondence to question her on and she has dragged that out for years. Without the record she is able to simply grandstand. I understand that in these days of ineffective politicians, it's unusual to have someone actually dig for the truth, and I'm sure Clinton is a little surprised by the diligence, but the delay is that he's not simply willing to take her word for it, and she as tried to offer misiformation and crumbs in hope that it would suffice.

Here is a copy of Gowdy's letter which pretty clearly outlines why he wants the record and why he's not taking her word for it

http://benghazi.house.gov/sites/repu...%204.23.15.pdf
 
Old 05-22-2015, 04:13 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,444,477 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Amazing that people will defend anything and everything this woman does and says. And they think nothing of a weekend document dump.

You have to questions someone's mental makeup if they honestly believe this woman is Presidential material. You think the transparency and over reach by Obama was bad, you can only imagine how much worse itll be with her.
I know right. And billly boy looking us straight into the eye, and in the camera: Did not have sex and play games with that intern RIGHT.

These Clinton's can look you straight into the eye, and lie their azz off. Most people believe even democrat friends of ours, that she is Guilty. And she sure does act like it.

Just like the Video fiasco right. Wrong.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 04:16 PM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,095,872 times
Reputation: 1632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Either you're intentionally leaving out a lot of information to twist it or you just lack a lot of information. Gowdy wants the have the complete record of the correspondence to question her on and she has dragged that out for years. Without the record she is able to simply grandstand. I understand that in these days of ineffective politicians, it's unusual to have someone actually dig for the truth, and I'm sure Clinton is a little surprised by the diligence, but the delay is that he's not simply willing to take her word for it, and she as tried to offer misiformation and crumbs in hope that it would suffice.

Here is a copy of Gowdy's letter which pretty clearly outlines why he wants the record and why he's not taking her word for it

http://benghazi.house.gov/sites/repu...%204.23.15.pdf
He has had these emails since February. He has had taxpayer money to spend on this crusade, which has lost any pretense of not being politically motivated. Are you saying his taxpayer funded staff can't read them all in three months?
 
Old 05-22-2015, 04:25 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,444,477 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
Either you're intentionally leaving out a lot of information to twist it or you just lack a lot of information. Gowdy wants the have the complete record of the correspondence to question her on and she has dragged that out for years. Without the record she is able to simply grandstand. I understand that in these days of ineffective politicians, it's unusual to have someone actually dig for the truth, and I'm sure Clinton is a little surprised by the diligence, but the delay is that he's not simply willing to take her word for it, and she as tried to offer misiformation and crumbs in hope that it would suffice.

Here is a copy of Gowdy's letter which pretty clearly outlines why he wants the record and why he's not taking her word for it

http://benghazi.house.gov/sites/repu...%204.23.15.pdf


You got that right. Would you take her at face value, I sure as hell would not. The liars they are.

Nor would anyone with common sense take her word.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,845,391 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
You think Gowdy is the one that wants to avoid an open exchange?
Um, yes or at least delay the exchange until it is closer to the election.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Canada
6,141 posts, read 3,373,037 times
Reputation: 5790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
He has had these emails since February. He has had taxpayer money to spend on this crusade, which has lost any pretense of not being politically motivated. Are you saying his taxpayer funded staff can't read them all in three months?
I kind of LOL at some of those questions they wanted to ask..because obviously NONE of them even know anything about "Personal Server's" nor what it entails. Hillary's husband was a POTUS..and knew full well on security..and all the why's and wherefores...The concerns of security of Governmental communications wanted by default to have them be sent to "their" site..BUT Hillary had a Very secure Server ( Fed's have already been infiltrated by hackers)

Chinese hackers may have breached the federal government’s personnel office, U.S. officials say - The Washington Post

Anonymous Says It Hacked the US Government Personnel Database Before China | Motherboard

St. Louis Federal Reserve Suffers DNS Breach — Krebs on Security

Just maybe The Clinton's Security outweighed Federal's ability to keep information secure...Maybe They should be thanked NOT RIDICULED!!

CLINTON EMAIL SECURITY STRENGTHS CONTRAST FEDERAL SECURITY
Correct The Record | Clinton Email Security Strengths Contrast Federal Security
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top