Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-22-2015, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

https://www.weeklystandard.com/artic...er_992185.html
This is a story that received much less attention than it deserved, IMO.

Last week the Wisconsin Supreme Court halted an investigation by Democratic prosecutor John Chisholm against conservative activists and allies of Gov. Scott Walker. The investigations involved a series of pre-dawn SWAT raids on the homes of activists. The ostensible object of the raids was information regarding violations of state campaign finance law.

In one raid, police barged in to the home of a woman before she had a chance to get dressed, and watched her get dressed no doubt with high-lumen SWAT flashlights trained on her. That woman was Cindy Archer, architect of Act 10, a Wisconsin law that reformed public sector unionism.

The wife of prosecutor Chisholm is a teacher and union shop steward. (Shop steward is elected to represent workers in a given shop--in her case she probably represented all the teachers in her particular school).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayes
]“Chis­holm’s wife was a teachers’ union shop steward who was distraught over Act 10’s union reforms,” reported National Review’s David French. “[A former prosecutor] said Chisholm ‘felt it was his personal duty’ to stop them”—legal authority be damned.

The court put the kibosh on it last week. Again from the Stephen Hayes (weekly standard) piece:

Quote:
According to the Wisconsin ­supreme court’s ruling halting the investigation...the special prosecutor also had seized wholly irrelevant information, such as retirement income statements, personal financial account information, personal letters, and family photos.” Further, “this conclusion ends the John Doe investigation because the special prosecutor’s legal theory is unsupported in either reason or law.” That bit about the investigation not being founded in “reason” is a remarkable statement coming from a panel of judges. It’s legalese for shouting “Have you no sense of decency, sir?” at the prosecutor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top