Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'd say it's a high price to pay for being immoral.
By the way, you all are carrying on an argument where there is none. This is about PP and our money being used to fund it. It's not about making abortion illegal, since the law governs that.
Cancer screening and contraceptions are immoral? That has to be the weirdest set of morals I have heard anyone having.
Your tax dollars aren't funding abortions.....not sure why this is so hard for some right wingers go grasp.....
Immoral? Sex without being married is immoral? Who the heck appointed you moral arbiter of the world?
\
You must have a limited reading list. I wasn't quoting myself. I was quoting from a higher authority. Lift your sights a bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy
Getting pregnant has nothing to do with having sex with the 'wrong' person. You can get pregnant having sex with pretty much any man who has sperm. geezus
You misread or assumed something that isn't there. Or maybe it just went over your head?
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
Cancer screening and contraceptions are immoral? That has to be the weirdest set of morals I have heard anyone having.
Your tax dollars aren't funding abortions.....not sure why this is so hard for some right wingers go grasp.....
A misreading or assumption again? Do read it again and tell me where I said anything about cancer screenings or contraception.
Some people seem to have difficulty understanding what they are reading.
A misreading or assumption again? Do read it again and tell me where I said anything about cancer screenings or contraception.
Some people seem to have difficulty understanding what they are reading.
You said you wanted to defund Planned Parenthood, and that is where federal funding goes to, cancer screenings and contraceptions. So why are you against that or are you unaware that is what federal funding goes to?
You said you wanted to defend Planned Parenthood, and that is where federal funding goes to, cancer screenings and contraceptions. So why are you against that or are you unaware that is what federal funding goes to?
You are confused. I would never defend PP. You're thinking of some other poster.
By the way, you all are carrying on an argument where there is none. This is about PP and our money being used to fund it. It's not about making abortion illegal, since the law governs that.
No, it's not about PP, the ultimate goal is to criminalize abortion. As far as funding planned parenthood- no government money is used to pay for abortions - that's a fact look it up yourself if you didn't know that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound
You must have a limited reading list. I wasn't quoting myself. I was quoting from a higher authority. Lift your sights a bit.
Let me guess..God personally landed in your living room and told you that having sex if you aren't married is immoral
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound
You misread or assumed something that isn't there. Or maybe it just went over your head?
You are referring to this remark?No nothing went over my head I think I responded appropriately to a very 'odd' statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise
High price to pay for not being careful about who you have sex with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound
Some people seem to have difficulty understanding what they are reading.
Direct attacks come in lots of different forms, but they are what they are, and I would prefer if you stuck to arguing issues.
There is no taxpayer money being used to fund abortions, there is no profit made on dead fetuses, so what is the reason for removing the remaining funding for PP's contraception and other services, what exactly does that accomplish.
By the way although PP performs the highest number of abortions they only account for half, where is this outrage for the others that provide that service.
I find it naive to believe that taxpayer money isn't paying for abortion. When they receive taxpayer money, it all adds to their total revenue. This allows them much more flexibility in how they spend their money. They can devote more resources to abortion services when they can depend on taxpayer dollars coming in. What is so difficult to understand about this? They can say they don't spend taxpayer money for abortion. But that money still helps in that area. In other words, they can shift money from other activities if they are making it up from federal funds.
I see no reason why we have to support PP with tax dollars. They don't need it.
I find it naive to believe that taxpayer money isn't paying for abortion. When they receive taxpayer money, it all adds to their total revenue. This allows them much more flexibility in how they spend their money. They can devote more resources to abortion services when they can depend on taxpayer dollars coming in. What is so difficult to understand about this? They can say they don't spend taxpayer money for abortion. But that money still helps in that area. In other words, they can shift money from other activities if they are making it up from federal funds. I see no reason why we have to support PP with tax dollars. They don't need it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You upset, bro?
