Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-04-2015, 12:14 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,275,882 times
Reputation: 5565

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
You morons keep coming out with that...yet the videos are available UNEDITED!!! You lie and you lie knowingly. Just admit, you don't care what they do. Just admit you wouldn't care if they aborted babies at 8 or 9 months. You just don't care because you lack morals
Your morals are not my morals.

 
Old 08-04-2015, 12:15 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,275,882 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
...smh...

so an abortion dr. haggles over the price she is going to get for baby parts and states she wants a Lamborghini.... and that's edited? that didn't happen?

what? did they go find some magiznes and cut words out and glue them together to get her to say all that?


she was all like "look I don't sell babyparts, pass the salt"

she was all like that?????


LOL. editing does not change what was said. I learned that from liberal prog-agressives.
You ever sat around with a bunch of medical professionals around lunch? They commonly talk about gross stuff.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 12:26 PM
 
624 posts, read 378,952 times
Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Well, it looks like PP might be screwed. Maybe.

Conservative pro-lifers, get your houses ready. Paint a nursery or two! A lot of lower socio-economic colored babies will be coming their way, and we need these folks who love "innocent, beautiful babies" to take charge by adopting a few, like Jesus said you should. They are not easily or quickly adopted in many places in light of their skin color; white, Hispanic and Asian babies move faster. For example, black kids are 7 times less likely to be adopted than non-black kids. Based on studies, unwanted babies are not going to have a very good life in general. So, y'all ready to save them, right? Feel free to give them names like Trevor, Laird, Caden or Colin, or Madison, Caitlyn, Amanda or Martina.

Mick
If that was the result of defunding PP with Federal dollars, then so be it. I'm sure some of those kids would grow up to be truly amazing people that will do great things.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 12:29 PM
 
624 posts, read 378,952 times
Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Sure, "save the beautiful, precious babies" and just leave them unwanted and neglected. Do your part and adopt a few yourself. You are not a hypocrite, I am sure.

Callousness of religious fanaticism.

Mick
Why do you believe these babies would be unwanted? Infants of all colors are in high demand.

It's crazy that someone thinks that the solution for possibly not being adopted should be death.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 12:29 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,361,452 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
You ever sat around with a bunch of medical professionals around lunch? They commonly talk about gross stuff.
Gods...dinner with the local mortician, and a anesthesiologist as a kid gave me a horrific sense of humor.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,165,951 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
lol, oh wow, you got BC pills from there. STOP THE PRESSES, HALT THE TRIAL! BFD!
Actually for lots of women it is a BFD....not sure why this is something you would overreact about...
 
Old 08-04-2015, 03:10 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,134,844 times
Reputation: 13661
So, if abortion is banned, would pro-lifers still have a problem with gay couples adopting children?
 
Old 08-04-2015, 03:17 PM
 
20,457 posts, read 12,375,634 times
Reputation: 10250
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
So, if abortion is banned, would pro-lifers still have a problem with gay couples adopting children?
hmmm.... this isn't about banning abortion.

how about lets stick with reality?


until and unless the SCOTUS changes 50 years of consistent rulings, banning abortion cannot occur.

This is about 3 things.
1. did Planned Parenthood break the law?
2. exposing Planned Parenthood for the horrible people they are so Americans understand what these people really are.
3. In light of these revelations should Planned Parent receive taxpayer funding?


THAT is what this is about. nothing more nothing less.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 03:25 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,134,844 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
hmmm.... this isn't about banning abortion.

how about lets stick with reality?


until and unless the SCOTUS changes 50 years of consistent rulings, banning abortion cannot occur.

This is about 3 things.
1. did Planned Parenthood break the law?
2. exposing Planned Parenthood for the horrible people they are so Americans understand what these people really are.
3. In light of these revelations should Planned Parent receive taxpayer funding?


THAT is what this is about. nothing more nothing less.
The reality is that Planned Parenthood is a resource relied upon by many low-income women. Taking away funding will effectively make abortion more inaccessible to them. There are many pro-lifers who know they can't reverse Roe v Wade, but want to take roundabout measures to make it difficult for women to get abortions. Though I'm not saying you or everyone up in arms about the videos has this motivation, it seems like those who do would favor yanking funding over alternative punitive measures that wouldn't affect those who need PP's services as much.
 
Old 08-04-2015, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,165,951 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
hmmm.... this isn't about banning abortion.

how about lets stick with reality?


until and unless the SCOTUS changes 50 years of consistent rulings, banning abortion cannot occur.

This is about 3 things.
1. did Planned Parenthood break the law?
2. exposing Planned Parenthood for the horrible people they are so Americans understand what these people really are.
3. In light of these revelations should Planned Parent receive taxpayer funding?


THAT is what this is about. nothing more nothing less.
No law wad broken other than illegally filming.

There is nothing to expose unless one is a hateful right winger pushing an agenda.

And yes, Planned Parenthood should continue to receive taxpayer funding because Congress continues to allow them to receive funding.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top