Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It took them months just to recover all of the emails from the private server that Clinton had wiped clean, that was after the jockeying just to get her to turn over the server in the first place of course.
If you honestly believe that Hillary Clinton is nothing more than the victim of a smear by the GOP and has done nothing whatever wrong or unethical then you need help.
I don't "believe" anything. The legal system doesn't operate on "beliefs", but the political system surely does.
I hear Pubs whining continuously over two decades.
I see no indictments.
I conclude it's one of two things:
1. Hillary really has committed all these horrible acts and is guilty as all hell. But she's just SO much smarter and more capable than the poor incompetent Pubs that they'll never be able to pin anything on her.
- or -
2. The Pubs are scares spitless of her and are doing everything they can conjure up to make their low-info followers "believe" that she's an unrepentant criminal.
The Pubs have been "investigating" Hill and making accusations of all kinds of horrible crimes for over 20 years.
As of today, the number of charges is zero. The number of indictments is zero.
The current FBI investigation will go nowhere. Both of her predecessors (Powell and Rice) used their private email and no one ever heard a squeak about it. Because they were serving as Republicans. This too will end up being just another GOP snipe hunt. But the Pubs love their never-ending fake scandals. It's what they do instead of their jobs when they have a majority in congress.
Of course they don't. They've been investigating for many months now w/o results. Let's see if this is any different than all the other "scandals" she's been accused of.
I'm convinced that if any of slander the GOP has aimed at Hillary since the early 90s had any substance, she would have been put away long ago. Instead, she's running for president and it scares the peewaddle out of the GOP.
Which Republican in the FBI is forcing this to go on and on without results? Can you name someone? Is someone in the FBI guilty of railroading one single family?
As for slander since the 90's. Have the Clintons EVER filed slander lawsuit in any 'scandal' since the 90's?
In the Clintons case, where there's smoke, there's a smokescreen. If everything is on the up and up, why are so many unanswered questions since the 90's? Allegations need to be vetted. And when answers coming from those questioned are 'Because I said so', that doesn't cut it in a court or the public eye.
Which Republican in the FBI is forcing this to go on and on without results? Can you name someone? Is someone in the FBI guilty of railroading one single family?
Do tell!
Quote:
As for slander since the 90's. Have the Clintons EVER filed slander lawsuit in any 'scandal' since the 90's?
The only one mentioning slander is you.
Libel is more applicable, but being public figures, I doubt that the Clintons would be able to qualify.
In the Clintons case, where there's smoke, there's a smokescreen. If everything is on the up and up, why are so many unanswered questions since the 90's?
I wonder if "someone" keeps up the smears for political purposes...
Quote:
Allegations need to be vetted.
Yes they do.
In more than 20 years of accusations, none have been. Many GOP "lawmakers" are lawyers. They should know how to do that. It shouldn't require decades. But they still have nothing but name-calling to show for all of their "investigations." But that's all it takes to get their base up and barking like Pavlov dogs.
Works every time.
Quote:
And when answers coming from those questioned are 'Because I said so', that doesn't cut it in a court or the public eye.
Of course they don't. They've been investigating for many months now w/o results. Let's see if this is any different than all the other "scandals" she's been accused of.
I'm convinced that if any of slander the GOP has aimed at Hillary since the early 90s had any substance, she would have been put away long ago. Instead, she's running for president and it scares the peewaddle out of the GOP.
Completely ignoring the fact that the Clinton's are past masters at stonewalling, obfuscating, distracting, attacking the investigators and then once they've delayed as much as they can they start screaming that this is old news. All aided and abetted by a complicit media. Your denials don't hold any water to an objective observer but you can keep drinking and distributing the Koolaid. Leftist love living in fantasy land and denial is their way of life.
I think you are mistaken: republicans wouldn't vote for her regardless. Hillary scares the peewaddle out of DEMOCRATS, which is why she's currently behind in polls and and votes cast in the primaries.
Her biggest problem with likely democrat voters is they don't trust her. But you knew that.
Completely ignoring the fact that the Clinton's are past masters at stonewalling, obfuscating, distracting, attacking the investigators and then once they've delayed as much as they can they start screaming that this is old news.
Poor lil' Pubs!
They have to prove something, which they've been absolutely unable to do.
Making all those nasty accusations that they have no evidence for. And the big bad Clintons not admitting to what they haven't been indicted for.
Quote:
All aided and abetted by a complicit media.
You mean the media that keeps reporting on these phony scandals and televising the congressinal hearings - the last one that was 11 hrs long.
That media?
Quote:
Your denials don't hold any water to an objective observer but you can keep drinking and distributing the Koolaid. Leftist love living in fantasy land and denial is their way of life.
Denial?
If the Clintons are guilty of something, then DO something about it. Charges, indictments, trials...
You know. The legal process. GOP lawyers know about those things.
I'm looking at over two decades of no indictments, but lots of nasty name-calling.
You're denying that your precious Pubs have nothing.
They are DOING something about it. They are keeping the smear machine going. And they've been successful at THAT for close to a quarter of a century now. It works amazingly well on the demographic they want it to work on. Actual indictments aren't necessary when their target audience will believe smears and unsubstantiated innuendos just as readily.
They are DOING something about it. They are keeping the smear machine going. And they've been successful at THAT for close to a quarter of a century now. It works amazingly well on the demographic they want it to work on. Actual indictments aren't necessary when their target audience will believe smears and unsubstantiated innuendos just as readily.
Do you really think a couple that was broke in 2000 is suddenly worth $200 million without selling influence?
And just to refresh your memory of another Hillary problem:
"Blair, who at the time was outside counsel to Tyson Foods Inc., Arkansas' largest employer, says he was advising Clinton out of friendship, not to seek political gain for his state-regulated client. At the time of many of the trades, Bill Clinton was governor.
Hillary Clinton has said she made all the trading decisions herself and has tried to play down Blair's role. But she acknowledged in April, three weeks after her trades were first disclosed, that Blair actually placed most of the trades."
They've been selling influence their whole life for power and money. If they had an R next to their name you would be screaming.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just another phony scandal
