Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:21 AM
 
4,176 posts, read 6,336,673 times
Reputation: 1874

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by justanokie View Post
Anyone who thinks a new justice has more than a snow balls chance in hell of getting appointed until after the elections is smoking crack.

Its just not going to happen.

If it was a dem controlled congress and a rep president the outcome would be the same.

Neither party is going to let a lame duck pres from a different party appoint a justice. Not gonna happen.

Obama's quote about the constitution and it being bigger than our parties was laughable. I don't know how that guy says stuff like that with a straight face. I can't name a president since FDR who has done more to destroy the constitution than him.

LOL.

He knows he's lame and doesn't have a chance of getting a justice nominated. Any big liberals better hope he doesn't nominate someone that would normally stand a chance and make a good "liberal" judge. Anyone nominated by him will be a waste and won't be getting nominated by whomever takes Obama's place.

Well, now that I think about it. There is a chance it could happen. I mean most of the repubs in power now have sold their souls already so once more isn't gonna hurt them any more.
You hit the nail on the head. For a liberal, the ends justify the means. The constitution is living and breathing (read: non-existent) when it stands in the way of their agenda (which, by the way, is not good for the country). When they can use the constitution to justify their policy, they act like strict constitutionalists.

That said, when has Obama not gotten what he wanted out of the GOP Congress? I don't see him not being able to appoint the next SCOTUS nominee. He's not stupid: he can appoint someone who is female and/or non-white and let the media play the race/gender card on his behalf should the GOP not fold like a cheap suit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:23 AM
 
2,962 posts, read 5,001,666 times
Reputation: 1887
It would appear that there is an almost perfect candidate. Of course political wrangling and one-upsmanship may preclude him. Interesting.

Sri Srinivasan: Supreme Court justice in the making?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:24 AM
 
4,176 posts, read 6,336,673 times
Reputation: 1874
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankys bbq View Post
Are you really that stuck on R and D?

Obama licking his chops?

The guy isn't even in the ground yet and you're the one salivating at the possibility of making the SC more to your liking. Pathetic.

Seems like the SC is good and just when it suits your agenda, and legislating from the bench when the SC doesn't agree with you. I wish people like you would make up your damn minds.
Are you surprised? You should have read the comments on news stories of Scalia's death. Liberals were openly trashing him and celebrating his death.

Sounds like you're giving liberals a lot more credit than they deserve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:36 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,630,750 times
Reputation: 12560
Repubs seem worried! I wonder why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:38 AM
 
8,299 posts, read 3,815,138 times
Reputation: 5919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl View Post
Repubs seem worried! I wonder why?
Because Obama is not likely to nominate a candidate who we will agree with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:40 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,038 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
You can only delay for so long until it's obstruction. There's no value in delaying in this case.
Apparently, Reid thought there was sufficient value in permanently delaying over 300 House bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:41 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,150,886 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Apparently, Reid thought there was sufficient value in permanently delaying over 300 House bills.
And you think that's okay? Sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:43 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,038 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDnurse View Post
We should let the constitution work. Obama should nominate a replacement and the Senate votes.
That would work if Obama actually honored his Presidential Oath of Office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. He doesn't now, and didn't before he was elected POTUS (2001 WBEZ interview)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:55 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,038 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
That is part of a Robert Bork quote. People study the decisions but few study the Federalist papers or the Constitutional Convention. Our Constitution has been severely damaged and we our one justice away from our property right, our 2nd Amendment rights and our 1st Amendment rights from being seriously curtailed. Too bad you are incapable of understanding this.
Our 4th and 6th Amendment Rights are seriously imperiled, as well.

This has not been a good time in history for our country. Biggest erosion of our Constitutional Rights in my lifetime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:58 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,038 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
And you think that's okay? Sad.
No, I don't. But because that's how Dems play, they shouldn't be surprised that Rs will play it that way, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top