Sandy Hook parents suing Remington (gallon, lawyers, death, government)

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Hyperthetic

They should be suing Obama.

He's closer to having something to do with it than the gun maker.

MUCH closer!

Oh? Please do explain the no doubt brilliant legal reasoning behind that statement.

[Northeastah]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

I got a good laugh out of #4


(4)The manufacture, importation, possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States are heavily regulated by Federal, State, and local laws. Such Federal laws include the Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act [26 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.], and the Arms Export Control Act [22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.].

you shouldn't comment on things you clearly know nothing about. Nothing.

[Floorist]

They know they can't win, they just need another chapter to finish their book.

[Felix C]

Did or can they sue the estate of the shooter?

[Redraven]

Just another publicity stunt to keep the tragedy alive and in the news.
They most assuredly would NOT allow me to sit on the Jury!

[hothulamaui]

these parents lost their children, they can do what ever they want. when your kindergartener goes off to school one morning and is brutally gunned down and killed then you can judge if you think it's "wrong" or not.

[renault]

Originally Posted by Northeastah

Why Sandy Hook parents are suing a gun-maker - CNN.com

I don't understand how suing an inanimate object makes any sense.

Should all families of people murdered by the US Gov't be allowed to sue gun, tank, plane and bomb manufacturers?

It's not about making sense. It's about pushing anti-gun/anti-Second Amendment agenda.

Using their logic, people should sue car manufacturers whenever a loved one is killed by a drunk driver.

Besides that, Sandy Hook was a government false flag operation–

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJLIqdFRHg0

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Northeastah

you shouldn't comment on things you clearly know nothing about. Nothing.

I would say it's rather lightly regulated wouldn't you?

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by Northeastah

they are suing a mfg of inanimate objects.

what added gun laws would have prevented this tragedy?

None that I know of.

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by lifeexplorer

Right. It's time to screw with people who have absolutely nothing to do with the tragedy but have money while conveniently ignore the party that is completely negligent and careless in enforcing the existing laws - the government.

What a bunch of wonderful people! Shame on them! They aren't some nice innocent people to begin with.

And shame on you to even think this should an option!

You've never lost a child to gun violence. I'm betting few on this board have. I haven't, thank God. I didn't send my kid to school only to have him/her end up in a body bag because some loon thought it was a great idea to shoot up a school.

These people have nothing else, nowhere else to go. So saying this is about money is ignorant.