Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
Well, of course.

Please cite a source of an actual instance of PP violating the Hyde Amendment.
The funds are being withheld by states because PP performs abortions in the same place they hand out birth control.

States can do that. And you are free to send PP your money to help make up the difference.

If you don't understand the issue then maybe you should just stick with the "religious side" of the argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,736,454 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Planned Parenthood does a lot of good for this society. It should be government funded.
If they weren't performing abortions at federally funded clinics then there would be no issue. Any PP clinic should have the option to cease and desist performing abortions -- and then I'm absolutely fine with them being federally funded.

If they want to perform abortions at X certain clinic, then that clinic should not receive any federal funding. This preserves their right to perform abortions and also preserves the much-touted right of the American people to not have to pay for abortions.

Pretty simple, don't you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
Actually, that's impossible. How do you separate federal dollars spent supporting a clinic from the abortion? Federal dollars keep the lights on and the rest of the utilities. Federal dollars pay things like property taxes and the rent/mortgage. Federal dollars pays for medical supplies. If federal money is paying for all those things for a clinic that performs abortions, then federal money is helping to pay for abortions.

If PP wants to continue to receive federal funding they can stop performing abortions and they can create separate clinics that do abortions. Only the abortion variety of PP clinic will receive no federal funding.

Anything less means that taxpayers actually are paying for abortions.

I've got no problem with PP doing everything else that they do. They're legally within their rights to run abortion clinics too. But we were told in no uncertain terms that taxpayer dollars are not paying for abortions in any way whatsoever. At present that simply isn't true.
Have you ever done any bookkeeping for a not-for-profit organization? I have.

There are accounting standards for allocating overhead costs among funding sources.

Of course shady bookkeeping and accounting can occur in *any* organization. That's why there is a whole profession dedicated to auditing.

Please cite an actual instance of PP violating those standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
If they weren't performing abortions at federally funded clinics then there would be no issue. Any PP clinic should have the option to cease and desist performing abortions -- and then I'm absolutely fine with them being federally funded.

If they want to perform abortions at X certain clinic, then that clinic should not receive any federal funding. This preserves their right to perform abortions and also preserves the much-touted right of the American people to not have to pay for abortions.

Pretty simple, don't you think?
And it is simple. They could easily separate their abortion clinics and abortion services into a subsidiary that gets $0 federal money.

And then life would go on with them continuing to get hundreds of millions of tax dollars.

But they won't do it and are fighting the mere thought of it saying "trust us" instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:43 AM
 
8,924 posts, read 5,629,144 times
Reputation: 12560
Republicans have used planned parenthood organization as the boogeyman for a long time. They don't want truth they want spin. That's what republicans are giving. Look how eager Carlie Fiorina was in sharing the lies about Planned Parenthood. They have to be outraged about something and planned parenthood is a good target....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl View Post
Republicans have used planned parenthood organization as the boogeyman for a long time. They don't want truth they want spin. That's what republicans are giving. Look how eager Carlie Fiorina was in sharing the lies about Planned Parenthood. They have to be outraged about something and planned parenthood is a good target....
And just what is the "truth" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
If they weren't performing abortions at federally funded clinics then there would be no issue. Any PP clinic should have the option to cease and desist performing abortions -- and then I'm absolutely fine with them being federally funded.

If they want to perform abortions at X certain clinic, then that clinic should not receive any federal funding. This preserves their right to perform abortions and also preserves the much-touted right of the American people to not have to pay for abortions.

Pretty simple, don't you think?
True, this is something that Congress might be able to do. The problem is that just about all doctor's offices and hospitals receive federal funds. They'd have to make the same choice.

And if most or all chose to stop performing abortions, then we'd have a Constitutional problem, because SCOTUS has already ruled that while Congress and states may regulate abortion, they may not regulate it out of existence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacqueg View Post
True, this is something that Congress might be able to do. The problem is that just about all doctor's offices and hospitals receive federal funds. They'd have to make the same choice.

And if most or all chose to stop performing abortions, then we'd have a Constitutional problem, because SCOTUS has already ruled that while Congress and states may regulate abortion, they may not regulate it out of existence.
It's not Congress that has to do anything here.

It's PP that has to do it and they have refused and fought it even at Congressional hearings.

Those doctors and hospitals that receive Fed funding do not perform abortions because the of Hyde Amendment. They WILL lose their funding.
Now why PP gets a pass is beyond me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And just what is the "truth" ?
In this case, truth would be actual evidence that PP violated the laws that govern fetal tissue. So far, that evidence is not forthcoming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,754,224 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's not Congress that has to do anything here.

It's PP that has to do it and they have refused and fought it even at Congressional hearings.
????? I can think of no particular reason why PP should emulate Catholic health care providers and choose to stop providing abortions.


Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Those doctors and hospitals that receive Fed funding do not perform abortions because the of Hyde Amendment. They WILL lose their funding.
Now why PP gets a pass is beyond me.
PP doesn't get a pass. They employ the same kind of professional accounting practices that all medical facilities use. Do you *really* think that only PP provides abortions in this country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top