Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2016, 09:15 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,740,196 times
Reputation: 1721

Advertisements

That's a silly post from a .org

Marijuana and Lung Health | American Lung Association

Cdc and everyone else: any introduction of smoke to the lungs is bad. All links to cancer are corollary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2016, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,558 posts, read 10,981,308 times
Reputation: 10813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stymie13 View Post
That's a silly post from a .org

Marijuana and Lung Health | American Lung Association

Cdc and everyone else: any introduction of smoke to the lungs is bad. All links to cancer are corollary.
Thanks for posting that article.
Extremely informative, which leads me to ask, why doesn't the ACS, who must be aware of the ALA studies, use the ALA information in ads against smoking weed?

As I stated in the original post, I have yet to see ONE ad from ACS related to smoking weed.
Could it be they are being paid off by concerns that could be hurt should they get on board with a campaign to let the public in on the dangers of smoking marijuana?

Bob.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2016, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stymie13 View Post
That's a silly post from a .org

Marijuana and Lung Health | American Lung Association

Cdc and everyone else: any introduction of smoke to the lungs is bad. All links to cancer are corollary.
Vaporizing and Edibles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 07:01 PM
 
22,662 posts, read 24,605,343 times
Reputation: 20339
Good question, maybe ciggies is enough for them to focus on.

Smoking anything is pretty unhealthy, IMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 07:05 PM
 
17,624 posts, read 17,682,949 times
Reputation: 25696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
Because nobody smokes a pack of blunts a day.
Really? Nobody? Not even certain celebrities like Snoop-dog and Willie Nelson and Tommy Chong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 07:06 PM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,329,046 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
Because nobody smokes a pack of blunts a day.
No kidding. Can you imagine? Holy crud that would be a slow a day!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,546,439 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
Because nobody smokes a pack of blunts a day.

I was going to say that but you beat me to it.


I've read research that says one joint puts a lot more toxins in the lungs and body than one cigarette but people tend to smoke a lot more than one cigarette per day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 07:11 PM
 
2,974 posts, read 1,984,679 times
Reputation: 3337
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Good question, maybe ciggies is enough for them to focus on.

Smoking anything is pretty unhealthy, IMHO.
except 'smoking hot'.........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
For as long as I can remember, the American cancer society has waged a battle over smoking cigarettes.
They have spent millions on ads stating the consequences of smoking, including "second hand smoke".
I have yet to see them come out with even one word about smoking marijuana.

Why is this.
Smoke in the lungs is very often a killer, and it boggles my mind why they have not come out against marijuana.

Anyone have an idea as to why the ACS is so silent on this issue?

Bob.
Good question.

Cannabis contains 459 chemical compounds including 49 known carcinogens, and 13 suspect carcinogens.

One of the same carcinogens cannabis and tobacco have in common is benzopyrene.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2016, 08:28 PM
 
3,129 posts, read 1,332,976 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Good question.

Cannabis contains 459 chemical compounds including 49 known carcinogens, and 13 suspect carcinogens.

One of the same carcinogens cannabis and tobacco have in common is benzopyrene.
And yet not even one documented case of cancer caused by cannabis in history. How do you explain that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top