Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:04 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,753,600 times
Reputation: 19118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
The cake is not part of the wedding ceremony. It is not even seen until after the couple are married. The cake is not in the church, or pushed down the aisle. It is not required to be there for the couple to get married. It is served at the reception.

Why do we even have such a thing that people commonly refer to as a "wedding cake" if it's not a part of the wedding celebration?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceofreazon View Post
Man, you people REEEALLY are splitting hairs here.
Cakes are part of the gay wedding or any wedding for that matter. If they were not, there would be no story here, no issue.

The baker does not want to P A R T I C I P A T E in a gay wedding because of his religious beliefs.
The baker is not participating in the wedding. They are not even invited to the wedding. They do not walk anyone down the aisle, or officiate. They do not sign the marriage license or carry the rings. They bake a cake, which is what they chose to do when they opened a bakery.

PS. Cakes are part of the RECEPTION, not the WEDDING.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:04 PM
 
Location: West Hollywood
3,190 posts, read 3,186,672 times
Reputation: 5262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowball7 View Post
That is a very un-American mentality.
Is it as un-American as saying one group of people is less than? Because I seem to remember the words "All men are created equal" having some importance in America.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
There is no law that says everyone around you is required to protect your dignity.
And baker's refusal to bake the cake is because he is against gay marriage... NOT GAY PEOPLE... gay marriage.
But nevermind.
Sorry, but that's total BS. There are discrimination laws protecting consumers, and saying "I don't hate gay people, I just hate it when they're treated like people" is the dumbest possible argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:06 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,700,406 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
The cake is not part of the wedding ceremony. It is not even seen until after the couple are married. The cake is not in the church, or pushed down the aisle. It is not required to be there for the couple to get married. It is served at the reception.
A wedding care is a big part of the celebration. Some would feel they are endorsing/accepting/approving of a gay marriage were they to support the event by baking wedding cake.

They contribute to the celebration!

Do you not understand that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
That is your perspective but it is not one that the bakers who refused share.
And the owner of Piggy park didn't share the perspective that mixed race seating was right, yet he had to serve them against his religious beliefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:08 PM
 
Location: West Hollywood
3,190 posts, read 3,186,672 times
Reputation: 5262
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Except that it would cost the baker to compromise his ethics and morals to provide the cake.
You cannot be a bigot and a moral or ethical person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:08 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,753,600 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
The baker is not participating in the wedding. They are not even invited to the wedding. They do not walk anyone down the aisle, or officiate. They do not sign the marriage license or carry the rings. They bake a cake, which is what they chose to do when they opened a bakery.

PS. Cakes are part of the RECEPTION, not the WEDDING.

The bakers feel different then you. It doesn't seem like you have even attempted to try and see it from their point of view.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
So do you have the right to go into a Jewish bakery and demand a cake with a huge swastika on it? Under your rules he MUST make it for you, right?

Can you go into a black owned bakery and demand a cake depicting a lynching because it will be used at a KKK rally? Under your rules he MUST make it for you, right?

Yes or no?
Do they OFFER cakes with swastikas or lynchings? If not then they do not have to sell them to anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Why do we even have such a thing that people commonly refer to as a "wedding cake" if it's not a part of the wedding celebration?
It is part of the wedding reception, not the wedding ceremony. The baker is not participating in the wedding by baking a cake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:11 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,700,406 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by MordinSolus View Post
You cannot be a bigot and a moral or ethical person.
Well, now...'bigot', 'moral' and 'ethical' are definitions in the 'eye of the beholder'. Or, are you a Supreme Being making that pronouncement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top