Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-12-2016, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
And hundreds if not thousands of Germany women and girls paid the price.
exactly Nobody wants to talk about it, sure some even think they deserved it.

I cringe when people say "we should thank so and so for certain war" well, history should never be forgotten, but there is absolutely nothing to be thankful when it comes to war. It is pure hell and there is no winning party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2016, 09:15 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,798 posts, read 2,801,052 times
Reputation: 4927
Default Winners & losers

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
exactly Nobody wants to talk about it, sure some even think they deserved it.

I cringe when people say "we should thank so and so for certain war" well, history should never be forgotten, but there is absolutely nothing to be thankful when it comes to war. It is pure hell and there is no winning party.
Hitler meant to leave only Aryans - whatever that means - in Europe, & eventually in the World.


Imperial Japan meant to do the same in Asia for Japanese & possibly in the World.


Stalin meant to leave only politically reliable minions & cowed populations in Russia, Eastern Europe & likely the World.


UK & France & the other colonial powers meant to restore some fantasy of a pre-WWI World, when they were presumably @ their peak.


Nazi Germany had to be defeated, & Imperial Japan had to be defeated. Stalin bequeathed organized institutional suffering to the USSR, which eventually expired of its squandering of human potential in endless political squabbling & monstrous paranoia - & the cumulative damage of population & material losses from WWII. The only reason to prefer the USSR over Hitler was that Stalin was careful not to commit the Soviets to unwinnable direct wars. This gave the West time to recover from WWII & simply outperform the Communist systems economically & politically. A long haul, to be sure, but better than blowing up the World.


The former colonial powers have presumably learned to live without illusions of grandeur. In any event, they are alive & with us to this day - for which they may or may not be duly grateful. The gratitude of (former) kings & queens is notoriously unreliable, & of only small moment to a republic.


Certainly the West is better for having repudiated Hitter & the Nazis, & for having outperformed the USSR. A direct war against the USSR - NATO v. Warsaw Pact - would have been dangerous for Europe & possibly the Northern Hemisphere. It's not clear how badly we might have damaged the World - & better that it remain a theoretical concern.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
Hitler meant to leave only Aryans - whatever that means - in Europe, & eventually in the World.


Imperial Japan meant to do the same in Asia for Japanese & possibly in the World.


Stalin meant to leave only politically reliable minions & cowed populations in Russia, Eastern Europe & likely the World.


UK & France & the other colonial powers meant to restore some fantasy of a pre-WWI World, when they were presumably @ their peak.


Nazi Germany had to be defeated, & Imperial Japan had to be defeated. Stalin bequeathed organized institutional suffering to the USSR, which eventually expired of its squandering of human potential in endless political squabbling & monstrous paranoia - & the cumulative damage of population & material losses from WWII. The only reason to prefer the USSR over Hitler was that Stalin was careful not to commit the Soviets to unwinnable direct wars. This gave the West time to recover from WWII & simply outperform the Communist systems economically & politically. A long haul, to be sure, but better than blowing up the World.


The former colonial powers have presumably learned to live without illusions of grandeur. In any event, they are alive & with us to this day - for which they may or may not be duly grateful. The gratitude of (former) kings & queens is notoriously unreliable, & of only small moment to a republic.


Certainly the West is better for having repudiated Hitter & the Nazis, & for having outperformed the USSR. A direct war against the USSR - NATO v. Warsaw Pact - would have been dangerous for Europe & possibly the Northern Hemisphere. It's not clear how badly we might have damaged the World - & better that it remain a theoretical concern.
haha I agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 09:54 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,281,720 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Your opinion against my opinion.
No, my opinion is based on facts. Whereas yours is simply an opinion based on emotion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
Agreed and HOW! My grandfathers told me lots of WW 2 stories even tho I was born much later.
My grandpa told me a lot of stories about ww2 as well. The difference between us is that my family was viewed as enemy alien. My papa was a painter, a well known one, a business man, a successful one. He had no opinion of the nazi because he knew nothing about it.

I have a relative who was the result of war crime. Her mom was raped by liberating soldier. Yeah, somehow, I don't think her mama deserved that. Growing up as a half breed in a country after war, imagine that.

Bottom line, history is just that, history. How? well, I learned at an early age that being part German/Japanese, I was just like everybody else. That is how I deal with others. People don't care about my heritage, but I do because heritage matters. It matters more when it is time to put you in internment camp. Then, one drop rule will determine your faith.

But if we talk about war crime, well, Germany and Japan were not the only two countries that committed horrible war crimes. Many Germans and Japanese lost their lives during war as well. They certainly didn't deserve it. I have tremendous respect towards Russian soldiers, I have competed with Russian athletes when I was in college. But are they God that saved the world? well, not to me.

To me, we are all result of random sexual act between a male and a female, I don't believe some people in certain region deserve to be bombed and killed simply because they ended up with crazy leaders.

Last edited by lilyflower3191981; 05-12-2016 at 10:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnirene View Post
I think the issue is the fairy tale that Americans single-handedly were responsible for the defeat of Nazi Germany. It's so disrespectful to the millions of people from other countries who died fighting: World War II death toll of all nations
I don't believe they ever claimed they won the war single handed, but their involvement shortened the war by several years or more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:19 AM
 
788 posts, read 512,620 times
Reputation: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by christianity View Post
yes, couldn't win the war without them..
Because they provided an ample supply of chests to absorb fascists bullets and shrapnel,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:20 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnirene View Post
I think the issue is the fairy tale that Americans single-handedly were responsible for the defeat of Nazi Germany. It's so disrespectful to the millions of people from other countries who died fighting: World War II death toll of all nations
I guess the 1,076,245 casualties (U.S.) was disrespectful also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Steeler Nation
6,897 posts, read 4,752,340 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Which is irrelevant, as Germany had already established itself as the aggressor by annexing Austria and invading Czechoslovakia at that point.



The Soviets did not "bring in the allied forces." The UK and France declared war on Germany in 1939 because they were allied with Poland. Germany did not invade the Soviet Union for another 2 years.

And there were not "half a million US lives" lost in the European theater, there were about 200,000. Compared to the Soviets who lost about 20 million.
That figure includes civilians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_...e_Soviet_Union
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 10:31 AM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,798 posts, read 2,801,052 times
Reputation: 4927
Default Call the question

Originally Posted by cdnirene
I think the issue is the fairy tale that Americans single-handedly were responsible for the defeat of Nazi Germany. It's so disrespectful to the millions of people from other countries who died fighting: World War II death toll of all nations


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
I guess the 1,076,245 casualties (U.S.) was disrespectful also.
That 1,076,245 number for US casualties is interesting. Where does it come from? cdnirene supplied a table of estimated deaths, military & civilian, in WWII. The US estimate - military deaths only - is 400,000. Who are the other 676,245? What are casualties - what's being counted there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top