Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know, it's interesting. You say yes, she should be charged with treason. Then you give an explanation that does nothing to explain HOW what she did was treason. It's almost like you don't know what you're talking about, but chose to offer your opinion anyway.
It's a pity you aren't smart enough to do your own research. Pay special attention to the word "aid".
And don't ask me to explain again. If you're capable of being here, you're capable of thinking for yourself.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
You don't have to be, in your goofy words, officially charged. What the hell! Get a clue!
If your boss even remotely suspects you of something, anything, he has the right to fire your butt. We, the People are firing that hideous Hillary. She doesn't belong anywhere near America!
IF you did your homework for clearance, you know that there are steps for removing anything from a govt employee or elected official- there are incident reports, interviews, policy review and so forth- the most common are proven facts of misconduct to disqualify you from holding a SS--or SCI are listed below
Adjudicative Guidelines
A: Allegiance to the United States
B: Foreign Influence
C: Foreign Preference
D: Sexual Behavior
E: Personal Conduct
F: Financial Considerations
G: Alcohol Consumption
H: Drug Involvement
I: Psychological Conditions
J: Criminal Conduct
K: Handling Protected Information
L: Outside Activities
M: Use of Information Technology Systems
The congress "interrogations"- and other investigations have not yielded fruit- to remove any clearances -at least to this date
and you can scream all you want- not changing a thing--- per my goofy words
It's a pity you aren't smart enough to do your own research. Pay special attention to the word "aid".
And don't ask me to explain again. If you're capable of being here, you're capable of thinking for yourself.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
She didn't give the enemies aid. That would require her to send copies of the emails to the enemies, which as far as I know, didn't happen. I know your imply that on a private server, the emails would be more easily compromised, but they'd still have to be compromised. I don't see how that constitutes as treason.
On a side no, there is no polite way to say this, but if you don't want people to ask you to explain yourself, do the world a favor and never speak again. When you make any political statement, you should be deeply saddened if no one questions it. Instead, you request it. I find that repulsive.
Can we also (please) boil her in a vat of gutter oil.. while taping her eyes permanently open, so she can forever stare at Donald Trump and his sign that says, "Clinton in Prison 2016"....
In January 2015, the New York Times reported that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department had recommended bringing felony charges against Petraeus for providing classified information to Broadwell. Petraeus denied the allegations and was reported to have had no interest in a plea deal.[196] However, on Tuesday, March 3, 2015, the U.S. Justice Department announced that Petraeus agreed to plead guilty in federal court in Charlotte, North Carolina to a charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified information.[197] On April 23, 2015, a federal judge sentenced Petraeus to two years’ probation plus a fine of $100,000. The fine was more than double the amount the Justice Department had requested.
Notice that the element of having transferred the classified material to an unauthorized person (which is a fundamental element of the Espionage Act) was omitted from his plea deal.
Should Hillary be charged with Treason for allowing easy access to State Department emails?
Should the Secretary of State have difficult access to email?
This question is profoundly stupid. The Secretary of State is responsible for the entire agency. An Secretary has the obligation of knowing what agency email contains.
Was her own server a dumb idea? Yes.
But it was more secure than Colin Powell's use of AOL.
However, comparing them is apples and oranges, as the internet was different when Powell served as Secretary.
Why did both use different servers? Because they needed an email source at home or in their off hours. Like the Presidency, the Secretary of State job is a 24 hour deal.
In hindsight, both of them should have gotten a government tech to set up a government server that was connected directly to the State Dept. servers, but all of the Secretaries so far have been human, and humans make mistakes every day of their lives.
The question that hasn't been asked so far is how hard the Clinton server was to hack. It's very likely that the private server had much more protection system wide than the government's servers. The government still gives out contracts to the lowest bidder. Individuals can choose any kind of internet service they wish, and the good ones are extremely secure.
Ain't a cowboy who can't be throwed, and ain't a horse that can't be rode, but there are horses who've broken a lot of cowboy's necks before finally getting one that could stay on to the end. So it is with internet servers. Any of them can be hacked in theory, but in practice, it's a different story.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Other statutes may yet come into play...
