Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2016, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,842,681 times
Reputation: 6650

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Nearly ALL were poor with not much more than basic skills.

Many were illegal and a hell of a lot of them were Europe's worst criminals.
what BS. Sounds like something from an In Living Color skit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2016, 01:10 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
what BS. Sounds like something from an In Living Color skit.
OK. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Proxima Centauri
5,772 posts, read 3,225,043 times
Reputation: 6115
Default Let's Get the History Right

Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
It seems like the main justification I hear for keeping the immigrants rolling in, from both the Left and Right in America, is that we're a "nation of immigrants". They point to, for example, the wave of Irish immigrants 100 years ago.

But aren't the circumstances a lot different today?
  • Not as much space. 100 years ago, there was still plenty of land to move to. Now it's all gobbled up, so that more people means pricer housing and propoerty.
  • Not as many jobs. Automation, outsourcing, and so forth have already created a situation where there is a lot of competition for jobs. There is not even enough jobs being created for the native-born Americans entering the working age, and yet we need to bring in more people to compete for the limited number of jobs?
  • Welfare. When the Irish immigrants came, it was work or starve. Nowadays, you come here and you are automatically entitled to tax dollars for not working, to unlimited $$$ for college tuition, to "health care", etc. It's been shown that today's immigrants are taking more in tax dollars than they are paying in tax dollars.
  • Not as easy to assimilate. Since America is such a culuturally divided country, there is no longer a "melting pot." Obviously it was easier for the Irish immigrants since America was 95% Christian, 95% White, 95% watched baseball, 95% spoke English in their homes, etc.
The Irish came here during and after the Civil War. They began forming unions and other trade groups. This led to the import of eastern and southern Europeans by the ruling class. What the ruling class didn't bank on was that the Italians and eastern Europeans already knew about unions. After some initial skirmishes especially between the Italians and the established Irish, the Italians and others joined those unions.

As late as 1893, land was being given away in Oklahoma.

Don't you see that the ruling class is doing the same thing to everyone that it did to the Irish back then.

The Irish didn't have it that easy. They were Catholics in what was still an English Protestant country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 02:07 PM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,955,708 times
Reputation: 11491
Sorry but the USA is a nation of Americans. Some of them happened to have been immigrants at one time.

After you naturalize you are a citizen, not an immigrant. You used to be an immigrant, no longer, now you are a citizen.

Its people who can't figure out the difference between immigrant and citizen that is part of the problem. The agenda of course, is to dilute what citizenship means.

This is really simple and here for those who still can't figure it out.

Immigrate is what you do. Citizen is what you are.
Immigrant is someone coming to and trying to be a Citizen.

Get it now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Miami, FL
8,087 posts, read 9,842,681 times
Reputation: 6650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Knife View Post
Sorry but the USA is a nation of Americans. Some of them happened to have been immigrants at one time.

After you naturalize you are a citizen, not an immigrant. You used to be an immigrant, no longer, now you are a citizen.

Its people who can't figure out the difference between immigrant and citizen that is part of the problem. The agenda of course, is to dilute what citizenship means.

This is really simple and here for those who still can't figure it out.

Immigrate is what you do. Citizen is what you are.
Immigrant is someone coming to and trying to be a Citizen.

Get it now?
True. I always say a scrap of paper does not make you an American either. Lot of flag of convenience folks here. They Do not care about this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 02:38 PM
 
2,605 posts, read 2,713,034 times
Reputation: 3550
bla bla bla some more bla
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 03:24 PM
 
1,185 posts, read 1,504,493 times
Reputation: 2297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger500 View Post
Small numbers will assimilate.
What kind of stupid argument is this?

How about the remainder? Do you like sharia law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 03:25 PM
 
1,185 posts, read 1,504,493 times
Reputation: 2297
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Nearly ALL were poor with not much more than basic skills.

Many were illegal and a hell of a lot of them were Europe's worst criminals.
Proof to back that one up holmes?

It's also pointless to debate a situation 100 years ago. There are so many variables at play in today's society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 04:52 PM
 
2,662 posts, read 1,379,439 times
Reputation: 2813
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
It seems like the main justification I hear for keeping the immigrants rolling in, from both the Left and Right in America, is that we're a "nation of immigrants". They point to, for example, the wave of Irish immigrants 100 years ago.

But aren't the circumstances a lot different today?
  • Not as much space. 100 years ago, there was still plenty of land to move to. Now it's all gobbled up, so that more people means pricer housing and propoerty.
  • Not as many jobs. Automation, outsourcing, and so forth have already created a situation where there is a lot of competition for jobs. There is not even enough jobs being created for the native-born Americans entering the working age, and yet we need to bring in more people to compete for the limited number of jobs?
  • Welfare. When the Irish immigrants came, it was work or starve. Nowadays, you come here and you are automatically entitled to tax dollars for not working, to unlimited $$$ for college tuition, to "health care", etc. It's been shown that today's immigrants are taking more in tax dollars than they are paying in tax dollars.
  • Not as easy to assimilate. Since America is such a culuturally divided country, there is no longer a "melting pot." Obviously it was easier for the Irish immigrants since America was 95% Christian, 95% White, 95% watched baseball, 95% spoke English in their homes, etc.
We are nowhere near that point where all of the land in the US is "gobbled up" and one of the current trends is for denser urban living. There are ways around this issue.
Many people drastically underestimate how culturally diverse late nineteenth and early twentieth century America was. My hometown of Dayton, Ohio featured neighborhoods where several languages were zookeeper and featured German language schools and newspapers. I can think of a small Ohio River mining town in Appalachian Ohio that had newspapers in three different languages. Much of America is actually less diverse now than then. Over a hundred languages were spoken in NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 06:07 PM
 
1,700 posts, read 1,046,123 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by TristramShandy View Post
People have argued against immigration from the beginning of this country. Benjamin Franklin said the Germans would never assimilate or learn English. It was a stupid argument then and it is a stupid argument now
Not sure what type of relationship the USA had with the various German states back then, but I don't think Germany was filled with religious fanatics who believed killing Americans would get them 72 Virgins.....just a minor difference.

I think an argument could be made late 1700 and early 1800 America admired Prussia. We don't really look up to Syria or Somalia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top