Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She thinks she is above the law....I hope this is true....would be wonderful.
Don't count on it. The fix has been in for some time--with Comey's cooperation.
You see, that's how things work in Hillary Clinton's orbit--she doesn't cooperate in investigations to expose the truth. But everyone else cooperates to keep her out of a jumpsuit.
She thinks she is above the law....I hope this is true....would be wonderful.
Just that the website, that posted that, assumes https://www.facebook.com/usawtfm/ (Army Officially Declare Hillary Clinton An “Insider Threat”) is a Official US Army page, should lead one to belive that they are full of crap.
FBI can only detain for questioning in an investigation. They have no authority to issue a warrant. That would have to come from Loretta Lynch. Do you see that happening, even if Hillary is connected to MURDER? I don't.
Royalty will not ever do the perp walk.
Just that the website, that posted that, assumes https://www.facebook.com/usawtfm/ (Army Officially Declare Hillary Clinton An “Insider Threat”) is a Official US Army page, should lead one to belive that they are full of crap.
But, go on and believe whatever crap you wish.
One might say the same regarding all the crap put out there about "He who must never be elected to the White House" Donald Trump.
"Clinton's untrustworthiness numbers are still high: 59 percent said Clinton is not honest and trustworthy and about two-thirds said she is too willing to bend the rules."
I'll tell ya, there are a lot of Hillary-haters. It couldn't possibly be that you're the one who won't face the facts and are propagandizing on her behalf, could it ? I admit, if your standards are criminal charges and Al Capone, she's a paragon of virtue.
Yes, there are a lot of Hillary-haters. They believe a lot of garbage. It's not "propagandizing" to challenge bs.
I would say that the standards that Hillary-haters have for what is truth is the problem.
Just like Hillary's billing records with the Rose Law Firm that showed her involvement in Whitewater got lost, then found when convenient, Hillary's emails got "deleted and purged" when she changed devices. If one believes this, then Hillary and Bill have some land to sell in Arkansas.
More bs.
Whitewater was a failed land development deal.
The Clintons' involvement was that they were investors. They were fortunate to get their investment back.
But all that would indicate is your faulty reasoning ability. As if not liking Hillary Clinton had anything to do with Putin or Russia in any aspect. But then, that type of reasoning (or lack thereof) does seem to form the basis of a lot of the left wing Democrat irrational and nonsensical attacks against "He Who MUST NOT be allowed to win the election" Trump so I suppose I should not be surprised at your attempt to lob it in my direction.
Quite different than from sources in which the statements are backed up with documentation, ie, copies of the emails, letters, and other communication, You-Tube and other videos. Makes them a lot more credible than the inflammatory and quite irrational "talking points" originating from George Soros funded sources such as Media Matters and intended for mindless regurgitation by their followers.
MY faulty reasoning ability??? LMAO.
Sources in which statements are backed up----that's YOUR problem. All the accusations you make against Hillary aren't backed up with documentation. And You-Tube isn't documentation, dear. That's why the countless investigations, the thousands of hours digging, the millions of dollars spent haven't yielded any criminal charges against the Clintons. Your hatred has colored your perspective to the point where you can't see with any clarity. Your sources aren't credible. If they were credible, then we wouldn't be looking at another Clinton presidency.
The democrats have no moral compass and cannot rid themselves of Hillary. She's operating like a dictator rising in the democratic well of politics and democrats don't care how corrupt she's demonstrated she is in her trouncing of free will.
Hillary sabotaged the first primary in Iowa by either threatening or buying the super delegates. The democrat's could not afford to see another 1972 rejection of their party elite. Then came new Hampshire where Bernie won but thru corruption, he lost in delegates by a mile.
Then came the email scandal with Hillary and the DNC that literally and figuratively stole the primary in a way that amazed third world dictators and the UN. Even the UN was rejecting Hillary's bullying tactics.
Then the worst was Bennie's public acceptance that Hillary corrupted the election process but then Bernie endorsed HillaHillarHillary
The democratic primary, told democrats they are too stupid to see corruption in front of their faces. If the democrats are okay with destroying of their own candidates, then democrats will dutifully march to the polls blind folded in November. Cue taps on democratic pride and honesty.
You've been drinking kool-aid. While there may be immoral and amoral Democrats, just like there are immoral and amoral Republicans, Libertarians, the simple fact is that Democrats have just as much a moral compass as anyone and everyone else.
You've been drinking kool-aid. Hillary hasn't operated like a dictator at all.
You've been drinking kool-aid. Hillary didn't sabotage the Iowa primary or any other primary. Bernie wasn't and isn't a Democrat. It's hard for a non-Democrat to win super-delegate support.
You've been drinking kool-aid. The e-mail "scandal" didn't just come along. It's been an on-going issue. And Hillary has conceded she made a mistake.
You've been drinking kool-aid. There is no evidence that Hillary colluded with the DNC staffers who should have been neutral but were pro-Clinton and who lost their jobs because they weren't neutral. But again, it's hard for a non-Democrat like Bernie to get the DNC behind him.
You've been drinking kool-aid. The primary process wasn't corrupted, Bernie put up a good fight and he achieved what he wanted, which was to pull the Democratic Party to the left, and when presented with the alternative of a Trump presidency, of course he's going to endorse Clinton.
You've been drinking kool-aid. Democrats are fine with a well-qualified candidate whose policy proposals are squarely aligned with the party's goals and agenda. That that candidate is flawed goes without saying. All candidates are flawed, because all candidates are human beings. All of us have issues with every candidate. It's the nature of a democracy.
This whole get Hillary reminds me of an incident years ago,
When a report of child abuse is received in California, it must be investigated. One of those grocery store tabloids anonymously reported Roseanne Barr was abusing her kids. An investigation was started.
The tabloid printed gigantic stories that Roseanne Barr was being investigated for child abuse. Made a big splash, sold lots of papers.
Same deal here. They could not get her on the e-mails, so now they are trying the foundation.
I really do not care which of these people is elected and do not intend to vote in that race. But Trump's new guy is bad news.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
HillaHillarHillary 