Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You could expect that since she was secretary of state that some foreign leaders would donate to the Clinton Foundation, that doesn't equate to corruption. That is exactly why they asked her to sign an agreement.
I will step up. Clinton is generally honest and trustworthy.
She is not always right and she sometimes does things which are not wise. There is lots of fair criticism of her behavior. The email server for instance was dumb. She could have had one but she needed to have a .gov one as well. That gave her the capability of claiming that the .gov was for government business. She could still use the other for government business but the intent would be to avoid that.
I, by the way, consider the email server more a failure of her staff than of Clinton. It was a carleless decision apparently lightly made. An executive such as Clinton should have had staff all over that decision and its obvious ramifications. So the fault I find with Clinton is that she did not have proper staff protecting her from such screwups. Too many yes people.
The poor reputation is due more to the ongoing Right wing smear than anything else.
You could expect that since she was secretary of state that some foreign leaders would donate to the Clinton Foundation, that doesn't equate to corruption. That is exactly why they asked her to sign an agreement.
Those she gave an ear to equate to more than "some".
They add up to donors being the majority.
I will step up. Clinton is generally honest and trustworthy.
She is not always right and she sometimes does things which are not wise. There is lots of fair criticism of her behavior. The email server for instance was dumb. She could have had one but she needed to have a .gov one as well. That gave her the capability of claiming that the .gov was for government business. She could still use the other for government business but the intent would be to avoid that.
I, by the way, consider the email server more a failure of her staff than of Clinton. It was a carleless decision apparently lightly made. An executive such as Clinton should have had staff all over that decision and its obvious ramifications. So the fault I find with Clinton is that she did not have proper staff protecting her from such screwups. Too many yes people.
The poor reputation is due more to the ongoing Right wing smear than anything else.
WOW! How can one ever respond to a comment from so far out in outer space.
Not even a devoted democrat would believe most of this hogwash...
The lady is corrupt and evil and has never told the truth in her entire life....
She has more blood on her hands than Count Dracula...
WOW! How can one ever respond to a comment from so far out in outer space.
Not even a devoted democrat would believe most of this hogwash...
The lady is corrupt and evil and has never told the truth in her entire life....
She has more blood on her hands than Count Dracula...
As I said the RW smear has had an effect.
The "true believers" however long ago lost their minds on the Clintons.
Those she gave an ear to equate to more than "some".
They add up to donors being the majority.
If you listen to the news you would think it's a majority, it is not even close.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
]