Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2016, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15640

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
What is sad is the IRS persecuted conservative groups in a highly partisan manner and even conservatives are more interested in beating down Hillary then actually protecting our Constitution. Hillary effed up but being ignorant ain't a crime.

All the Republicans had to do was nominate someone who was more likeable than Hillary (not a difficult task) and we would not have to worry about bringing her down now.

The horror of this is that many moderate democrats would have voted for Kasich, this was the perfect opportunity with Clinton's background to elect a republican president. I don't understand what in god's name they were thinking in the primaries, it's not as if he changed over time. They could have won this election going away, the republicans even annoyed democrats on this election with their choice.

 
Old 08-26-2016, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,347,290 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
Using your theory that 30% automatically won't trust a D, that still leaves nearly 40% to account for who don't trust Hillary. You think those 40% are brainwashed by a right wing smear campaign. imo, they came to their opinion using common sense and facts, and it's smug and arrogant to think otherwise.
Actually you should also note that in terms of such polling Trump does worse.

On favorable versus unfavorable views Clinton is clearly seen as superior to Trump. So when you factor in all views Trump loses.

Numbers I see suggest Hilary is dishonesty is well less than 60%. And I would explain 30% as the built in partisans of the lunatic right...20% due to the smear and 10% because she gets it wrong more often than is reasonable. Explanations of the the emails for instance were simply too far from reality. One can giver her a break for not being a IT expert but she should have counseled with a couple befored repeating a couple of claims. In at least some areas I knew she was wrong and my knowledge is at best obsolescent.
 
Old 08-26-2016, 11:25 PM
 
6,977 posts, read 5,708,706 times
Reputation: 5177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misanthrope83 View Post
FBI Sources Says James Comey Plans ‘Suprise’ Hillary Arrest | Your News Wire

She thinks she is above the law....I hope this is true....would be wonderful.
is it against the law as a member of law enforcement to let a criminal 'escape'?
 
Old 08-27-2016, 01:08 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,450,610 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misanthrope83 View Post
FBI Sources Says James Comey Plans ‘Suprise’ Hillary Arrest | Your News Wire

She thinks she is above the law....I hope this is true....would be wonderful.
Come on now. Does that even remotely make sense to you? Your IQ is surely not this low. My suggestion to you is that you stop reading those hallucinations as "news."
 
Old 08-27-2016, 02:00 AM
 
27,142 posts, read 15,313,785 times
Reputation: 12071
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Actually you should also note that in terms of such polling Trump does worse.

On favorable versus unfavorable views Clinton is clearly seen as superior to Trump. So when you factor in all views Trump loses.

Numbers I see suggest Hilary is dishonesty is well less than 60%. And I would explain 30% as the built in partisans of the lunatic right...20% due to the smear and 10% because she gets it wrong more often than is reasonable. Explanations of the the emails for instance were simply too far from reality. One can giver her a break for not being a IT expert but she should have counseled with a couple befored repeating a couple of claims. In at least some areas I knew she was wrong and my knowledge is at best obsolescent.




How then do you account for these "less than 60%" see Hillary as dishonest when the majority of Dems here plain ignore her deception and wrong doings and even defend her in them?


That in consideration leaves no room for honest accuracy/
 
Old 08-27-2016, 09:31 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,506,034 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
Actually you should also note that in terms of such polling Trump does worse.

On favorable versus unfavorable views Clinton is clearly seen as superior to Trump. So when you factor in all views Trump loses.

Numbers I see suggest Hilary is dishonesty is well less than 60%. And I would explain 30% as the built in partisans of the lunatic right...20% due to the smear and 10% because she gets it wrong more often than is reasonable. Explanations of the the emails for instance were simply too far from reality. One can giver her a break for not being a IT expert but she should have counseled with a couple befored repeating a couple of claims. In at least some areas I knew she was wrong and my knowledge is at best obsolescent.
Trump's low honesty/trustworthy ratings are because 30% is built in from the lunatic left, 20% from the left wing smear campaign, and 10% because he gets it wrong more often than is reasonable. See, two can play this game.


Hillary's low honest/trustworthy ratings are because she's shown she's not honest/trustworthy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top