Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2016, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,759,397 times
Reputation: 10006

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by zortation View Post
Does the human in the second video have more neanderthal DNA? Maybe that's why he became a scientist, to study his own DNA.
I was thinking the same thing.

 
Old 09-25-2016, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,738,058 times
Reputation: 20674
Reportedly, 40% of US adults believe in Young Earth Creationism- Earth is less than 10,000 years old.

Then again, reportedly 80% believe in angels.
 
Old 09-25-2016, 07:27 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
It's not so strange really. Humans share 90% DNA with cats and mice, cows and zebra fish about 80% and maybe 60% with a fruit fly. A small percentage can make a big difference especially on behavior.
I'm looking at from the standpoint that humans once got "romantic" with another species that shares even less DNA with us than chimps (grant it we are talking about 0.1%).

It's just weird to think about. For me anyway. Science is cool and nutty.
 
Old 09-25-2016, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,363,818 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Reportedly, 40% of US adults believe in Young Earth Creationism- Earth is less than 10,000 years old.

Then again, reportedly 80% believe in angels.
Yikes.

Well, even more disturbing is we have about 55%-60% voter turnout for Presidential Elections.

Those folks are the real nuts.
 
Old 09-25-2016, 07:32 AM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,016,499 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
The most recent evidence is much stronger than what came before because new tech has allowed for much more thorough genetic analysis. And there is close agreement among the new studies. This team claims that out-of-Africa could not have occurred more than 75,000 years ago, but that there was an earlier group that left 125,000 years ago which accounts for 2% of Papuan DNA and left no trace in other populations.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9LRdoMeXC4

LOL. this guy looks like a living Neanderthal..........
 
Old 09-25-2016, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,759,397 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
LOL. this guy looks like a living Neanderthal..........
He may be evidence that Neanderthals actually were intelligent.
 
Old 09-25-2016, 09:37 AM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,172,697 times
Reputation: 2390
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Maybe so, since the dividing line between species is often defined as the inability to mate and produce healthy offspring. Homo sapiens and Neanderthals apparently did have children together who survived and had children of their own.
Neanderthals and homo sapiens are separate species. Many species do interbreed with one another, like the wolf and coyote and polar bears and brown bears. The inability to interbreed is not a strict rule for separate species classification, but more a general rule of thumb. Neanderthals and homo sapiens had lower inter-fertility and genetic compatibility than would be expected from members of the same species. This is one reason that Neanderthals are classified as a different species from homo sapiens.

Modern human genomes reveal our inner Neanderthal : Nature News & Comment
 
Old 09-25-2016, 09:54 AM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,172,697 times
Reputation: 2390
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
LOL. this guy looks like a living Neanderthal..........
Nah. He's Estonian and shows his central Asian ancestry. Baltic people like Estonian and Finns were sometimes classified as Mongoloid in early racial classifications because their skulls and body type showed affinities to East Asians. Just imagine that guy with black, wiry hair and he would resemble a Mongolian. We know now that's because Estonians and Finns originate from central Asia.
 
Old 09-25-2016, 09:54 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Beagle View Post
It destroys the fairy tale that we are all the same that a large part of left-wing politics is reliant upon. If we aren't the same, it means that biology might explain a variety of social issues that have previously been blamed on environment. And that means that social programs are probably pointless since a social program can't change genetics.
Who in the hell believes that we're all the same? I know i don't.

But regardless, you now have your evidence and you're now armed with the information that you've wanted all along.

Now what? What are you gonna do with it? Gonna get rid of all of those "pointless" social programs?

Tell you what; take your study to your elected politicians and demand that they act on it. Lemme know what happened.
 
Old 09-25-2016, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,050 posts, read 505,729 times
Reputation: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
With the results from 3 major studies now in, there doesn't seem to be much doubt left about this. All non-Africans can trace the vast majority of their ancestry (96% or more) to a single small group of Homo sapiens who left Africa between 50,000 and 80,000 years ago. And members of this group also received a small amount of DNA from Neanderthals and/or Denisovans. Africans are not closely related to the out-of-Africa group and did not receive DNA from the other human groups.
The word choices are interesting and may reveal something deeper, but I leave that for the word-parsers and psychologists. What I see is, -to make my point obvious, -we could also say "there are two groups of humans living today: Americans and non-Americans, or we could shift to "Canadians and non-Canadians" or any other group.

Africans? Don't you realize there are lots of white Africans just like there are lots of white Canadians?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top