Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think she serves her purpose to balance out the views on the Senate, but as a POTUS candidate, I think she wouldn't be very good.
There won't be a single state in the South that would go for her in the Democrat primary unless the Democrats rig it again, like with Hillary, so that only one candidate has a possible chance of being nominated.
They don't seem to have learned their lesson yet, so I expect that it will happen again.
IMO, Pocahontas will do good to even keep her seat in 2018.
There won't be a single state in the South that would go for her in the Democrat primary unless the Democrats rig it again, like with Hillary, so that only one candidate has a possible chance of being nominated.
They don't seem to have learned their lesson yet, so I expect that it will happen again.
IMO, Pocahontas will do good to even keep her seat in 2018.
She'll keep her seat. She would not win the south or flyover states if she ran for POTUS.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
I've read that many Democrats also consider Warren their primary leader from numerous other sources.
Is this true, Democrats? If so, how does Warren project the face the Democrats want to show the American public?
She will never outlive that name.
If she does not find a way to embrace it, then she will forever be unelectable to POTUS.
Good. Trump branded her, and it has stuck.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.