Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-13-2017, 01:21 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
If the drug company cannot charge a high enough price anywhere, then their profits would be lower. And if the profits are too low then the drug might not be developed in the first place. It is simple economics.
The government has developed many new drugs. There are many ways to handle this. Many colleges have medical facilities that develop drugs. Research can be a requirement for continued government funding.

Quote:
Unfortunately HC in general is not simple economics. So we the people or our elected officials might force a drug company to make an unprofitable product? Or have gov't take over and make that unprofitable product?

Not very palatable responses IMO.
It's worked in the past. Countries with UHC still develop drugs also.

Roche is based in Switzerland. Sanofi in France. Viagra was actually developed in England.

 
Old 03-13-2017, 01:25 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,222,338 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
not sure if using Volvo as an example is a good idea

Volvo has been owned by the Chinese since 2010, when Geely bought Volvo from Ford

Volvo hasn't ever been a government owned company...

now on the other hand if you were trying to show a Swedish government owned company..that would be the now defunct SAAB
No one said it was or any product had to be government owned. The argument was that if the government was going to run and develop health care they would then by some stretch of the imagination of course, run and develop auto making.

Yes, it was a stupid argument. Germany makes some pretty impressive cars and they have UHC.
 
Old 03-13-2017, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,492,759 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
No one said it was or any product had to be government owned. The argument was that if the government was going to run and develop health care they would then by some stretch of the imagination of course, run and develop auto making.

Yes, it was a stupid argument. Germany makes some pretty impressive cars and they have UHC.
pk, wasn't trying to say anything bad (I cant give you a rep(must spreadaround)...and while we might not always agree on points, I respect your postings)

we all make bad analogies (I do it all the time)

yes Germany has a lot of good car manufacturers (just like the USA does)

Volkswagon has gotten in a lot of trouble recently with their 'misdirection' of diesel emissions recording and false advertising
 
Old 03-13-2017, 01:40 PM
 
18,804 posts, read 8,477,217 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the cost is way out of hand for the budget or the taxpayer

our government (the taxpayers) spend over 1 trillion dollars just on medicare and Medicaid

fy2016 which ended back in October the GOVERNMENTAL SPENDING (not what people spent out of pocket) for medicare 691.6 Billion dollars.... and Medicaid was 368.3 Billion dollars..... and that's not including what was spent with the VA
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...udgetdata.xlsx


let's look at the increases medicare has cost:
in 2000 medicare was 216 billion
in 2008 medicare was 456 billion
in 2016 medicare was 691 billion

Medicaid:
2000.....117 billion
2008.....201 billion
2016.....368 billion

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...udgetdata.xlsx
see the mandatory outlay tab



what is even more interesting is what the predicted outlays will be in the future
in 2016 medicare was 691 billion
prediction for 2020....963 billion
prediction for 2026....1.383 Trillion

actual Medicaid 2016.....368 billion
prediction for 2020....450 billion
prediction for 2026....616 Billion

so the prediction is medicare and Medicaid is expected to be over 2 trillion dollars is less than 9 years
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...ojections.xlsx


that's just the GOVERNMENT costs of Medicare and Medicaid.. on top of that you have the VA..and then what the PEOPLE are already paying for private insurance
Medicare is just great for the patient. Deficit spending is one very major reason that there are so few complaints from seniors.
 
Old 03-13-2017, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,219,950 times
Reputation: 38267
CBO scoring is out.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil...lthcareact.pdf

Quote:
In 2018, by CBO and JCT’s estimates, about 14 million more people would be uninsured,
relative to the number under current law.

In 2020, according to CBO and JCT’s estimates, as a result of the insurance coverage
provisions of the legislation, 21 million more nonelderly people in the United States would
be without health insurance than under current law. By 2026, that number would total
24 million, CBO and JCT estimate.
To clarify, that's 14 million MORE people than are currently uninsured and the numbers continue to climb. By 2020, total numbers would be 48 million total uninsured by 2020.

Quote:
CBO and JCT estimate that 48 million people under age 65, or roughly 17 percent of the
nonelderly population, would be uninsured in 2020 if the legislation was enacted. That
figure would grow to 52 million, or roughly 19 percent of the nonelderly population, in
2026.
 
Old 03-13-2017, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,813,927 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
CBO scoring is out.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil...lthcareact.pdf



To clarify, that's 14 million MORE people than are currently uninsured and the numbers continue to climb. By 2020, total numbers would be
Is anyone surprised? Trump voters have lived inside this bubble where logic and rational thought doesn't even exist. Hell they'll even argue over mathematics!
 
Old 03-13-2017, 02:39 PM
 
9,742 posts, read 4,498,256 times
Reputation: 3981
Default CBO report is in...14 million fewer will be insured

CBO report: 14 million fewer insured by 2018 under GOP health care law - CNNPolitics.com
 
Old 03-13-2017, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
2,940 posts, read 1,813,927 times
Reputation: 1940
The fake news trolls coming in 3..2..1....
 
Old 03-13-2017, 02:44 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,942,602 times
Reputation: 11790
In before tRumpies blame the CBO report on liberals, Mexicans, or Muslims
 
Old 03-13-2017, 02:45 PM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,639,515 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
CBO scoring is out.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil...lthcareact.pdf



To clarify, that's 14 million MORE people than are currently uninsured and the numbers continue to climb. By 2020, total numbers would be
well this is exactly what wealthy GOP members wanted. A massive tax cut (thanks) and taking healthcare insurance security from lower income and sick people.

the return of SICK POOLS needs to be pointed out time and time and time again.

Sick pools mean if you get any chronic illness you will end up paying massive insurance costs because the US gov is going to allow insurers to put you all in one basket. Which means you end up losing your home , you eat up your life savings.


Plus we cant ignore the lie of state borders, there are NO border rules stopping any company from selling across borders.

State borders are another lie. they don't exist apart from states having different standards that must be met.


Free market no where in the world is there a free market healthcare insurance market. NO WHERE.


NOTE there is NO expected decrease in premiums, but by 2026 they may slow the rate of increase. that is all.


so who wins? Well the rich win and the lower income trumpers lose out the most.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top