Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-29-2017, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,971 posts, read 17,921,644 times
Reputation: 10383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
It doesnt.

What matters is context.


Trump claimed that Obama was spying on him and his team, what actually happened is that we were spying on the Russians and his team just happen to be contacting them a lot.
The ones that were the alleged "target" would not have been targeted if they weren't involved with Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2017, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,773 posts, read 21,143,565 times
Reputation: 14273
when is she going to appear before a court or go to jail? - she is talking but still walking about??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,243,231 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
It doesnt.

What matters is context.


Trump claimed that Obama was spying on him and his team, what actually happened is that we were spying on the Russians and his team just happen to be contacting them a lot.
According to Nunes the documents he saw had nothing to do with an investigation of Russians.

You can't have it both ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,649 posts, read 26,435,779 times
Reputation: 12660
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Does the truth mean nothing to you?

Obama's "last minute" order to share information to avoid "stovepiping" intelligence has been in the works since right after 9/11.

If Obama had actually wiretapped Trump to get evidence for Democrats to use against him, why didn't they use it?

Your conspiracy theories are getting so far fetched is hard to imagine even you believe them.





They didn't use it because THERE WAS NOTHING THERE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Planet earth
3,617 posts, read 1,826,254 times
Reputation: 1258
This won't end well for democrats, especially the former administration. Someone has some 'splainin' to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 12:15 PM
 
Location: The Woodlands, TX
1,718 posts, read 1,058,770 times
Reputation: 1147
Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
This won't end well for democrats, especially the former administration. Someone has some 'splainin' to do.
Exactly.

I can't wait until we know the names of the Obama admin people who leaked information to the press.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 01:05 PM
 
4,660 posts, read 4,133,534 times
Reputation: 9012
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
She never said the bold...at all in any ways. I have no idea why you even tried to claim that she did, seeing as there is a video,



I understand you are a Trump supporter, but you should have enough objectivity to know what you said isnt even remotely true.



That never happened, at best the argument is that the DNC broke its own party rules, which isnt criminal.

2) The leaks, whether obtained from direct surveillance on Donald Trump or not, reveal that they acted as such until the bitter end.

Go get them Donald. It is time to stop giving Dems a pass on criminality. Start with this Farkas woman with this clip as being evidence.

One other thing:

.

None of the intelligence people so far have been democrats, they have all been either Republicans or independents who have worked for multiple presidents





1. Arguing that he wasnt in government yet is not a defense.

2. Bribery has nothing to do with who's money it is, its the exchange of funds or services to have a particular outcome.

Why are you arguing that if they gave him money, it would make him innocent. Im not even arguing that he is guilty, im just pointing out that your logic makes no sense.

3. As it has already been pointed out. Pence knew Flynn was lying back in December, because Sally Yates had already informed the Transition team about it. The story that he lied to Pence at least in context, seems to be a lie.

4. When Sessions met with what is described as a "Russian Envoy", there were not 50 other people in the room. Most accounts say there were 3 people.

The level of delusion is almost sad. I am not going to sit here and argue about what she said--anyone can hear it for themselves. I am going to ask again:

HOW DID TRUMP ALLEGEDLY COLLUDE WITH THE RUSSIANS?

1) What did he do with them to influence this election?

No vague nonsense about there being "smoke" or something. What are you claimig that he actually did? What is anybody claming that he did? To date, no case has been made.

2) Also, do you understand that the Democrats again acted criminally by leaking, and not masking, the identities of Americans?

3) Do you understand that the root of all of this is that wikileaks revealed the criminality of the Democrat party?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 01:19 PM
 
1 posts, read 447 times
Reputation: 10
Default Old clickbait "news"

This is old news, packaged by lazy millenial so-called "journalists" as clickbait. [url]https://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2017/03/29/evelyn-farkas-trump-wiretap-admission-fakenews-clickbait/[/url]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 01:26 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,079,027 times
Reputation: 3884
This ought to be fairly simple. A - look for political appointees who went civil service from political appointee just before (~6-9 months) or just after the election. B - look at Obama appointees still in place after the election and inauguration who could access the information. C - Subpoena them to testify before the House intelligence committee

Someone will break. Who knew what when?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Minded View Post
Exactly.

I can't wait until we know the names of the Obama admin people who leaked information to the press.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2017, 01:33 PM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,797,803 times
Reputation: 7020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
According to Nunes the documents he saw had nothing to do with an investigation of Russians.

You can't have it both ways.
Who said Nunes told the truth about it having nothing to do with Russia?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top