Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As said in a post that you didn't reply to, i'd think if someone really wanted to nuke us, they'd target a place like Omaha, home to Offutt AFB...where STRATCOM is.
Not interested in debating who would be the target in such a scenario. A little too grim for me.
I think some of the wording of this article, and particularly the headline, are ill-considered.
However, I can break it all down to one simple concept:
If you voted for the guy who makes war, other than as a clear act of self-defense, then yes, you are more deserving of the consequences of that war than the people who didn't.
Anyone want to argue with that? Bring it.
Your premise that everyone is a single issue voter and that a candidate's proclivity towards war is the only issue on which one's vote should be based is so spectacularly flawed, I'm speechless.
Your premise is wrong, therefore you conclusion is wrong.
Your premise that everyone is a single issue voter and that a candidate's proclivity towards war is the only issue on which one's vote should be based is so spectacularly flawed, I'm speechless.
Your premise is wrong, therefore you conclusion is wrong.
If Trump supporters choose a candidate whose "proclivity" is war, then they cannot be surprised that those who never supported Trump have no interest in being the target for his "proclivity" toward war. The man took five deferments and apparently can't remember which foot was the issue. His sons never served either.
I have rarely read such a bigoted, hate-filled rant as the one being discussed.
As liberals say, "Haters gonna hate."
P.S. And as a Euro-white senior living in a mostly white Denver suburb, I have NEVER heard even one conservative say anything even close to wishing that s/he could be free to unabashedly call blacks the N-word! Also, although some conservatives (and, btw, I voted for Johnson) are definitely low-information bigots with below average IQ's, I doubt that this applies to the majority of those who voted for Trump. Some people voted for Trump only because they thought that Trump was the lesser of two evils. IMHO, they were wrong, but does the writer seriously want to condemn all conservatives living in rural America for the opinions of some?
So am I to assume David Duke represents all right leaning people.
That's pretty ridiculous since the man supported Keith Ellison. Through the course of his career he has met with Dems at least 50 times......what are they talking about? Can't be too much of an enemy when the Dems are willing to talk face to face with him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
His sons never served either.
