Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are really going to crap your pants when you find out, it wasn't even his knife.
The knife belonged to the first guy that attacked him, after he would not shut up when told.
Of coarse you make that accusation, with nothing to explain, how you possibluy came to that fabricated opinion.
If I tell you, I'm going to kick your ass if you don't shut up.....
You are going to be as silent as a mouse, after that.... SURE YOU ARE!
Threatening anyone, might just get you killed.
Did those two guys in fact threaten the "stabber" to shut him up?
The man made no threats. He just gave her a piece of his mind, about what he thought about her allegiance. She had no counter argument to defend herself. That is the point she sits there and takes it, only to make him look like the fool. Anyone tries to stop this person from speaking his mind, and making no threats of harm, with physical action, deserves to get killed.
That is exactly what the 2nd amendment is for.
I feel sorry for these guys that got killed, as they did not understand the bill of rights very well.
Your brain is the most powerful weapon you own. When it fails you, a lesser weapon is not going to get you very far.
Without threats of violence, I defend this mans right to say what ever the hell he wishes.
Funny you'd defend the murderers right for verbal assault, but not the victims using the very same right to tell him to shut his mouth.
Funny you'd defend the murderers right for verbal assault, but not the victims using the very same right to tell him to shut his mouth.
He didn't murder the woman, she didn't even get a scratch. He defended himself against 2 men. That is not murder. Murder, pft! He didn't even bring the knife to the fight.
Funny you'd defend the murderers right for verbal assault, but not the victims using the very same right to tell him to shut his mouth.
Just following your lead as I don't know all the facts as of yet sooooo, If the suspect was not physically threatening or verbally threatening assault against said women and only insulting their race/religion/sex then he was not "assaulting" them. He was harassing them and disturbing the peace.
If in fact the two "hero's" physically threatened said suspect if he didn't shut up and/or had the knife the suspect then used on them there's going to be a problem for the prosecution AND the narrative that's being pushed.
Going to be interesting where this story goes if it doesn't die out when further contrary information is released...
The alleged killer is a Portland white supremacist who pledged to eradicate Jews and Muslims.
The Man Accused of MAX Double Murder Is a Portland White Supremacist Who Delivered Nazi Salutes and Racial Slurs at a "Free Speech" Rally Last Month
So. I defend his right to say what ever he wishes, no matter who or what he is, as long as he doesn't threaten harm.
The only people making threats of harm, are now dead.
Of coarse you make that accusation, with nothing to explain, how you possibluy came to that fabricated opinion.
If I tell you, I'm going to kick your ass if you don't shut up.....
You are going to be as silent as a mouse, after that.... SURE YOU ARE!
Threatening anyone, might just get you killed.
There was no mention of the men threatening the murderer, or getting physical with him. Nobody deserves to be killed for standing up for people who are being abused. You said they deserved to be killed - only a sick person would think that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.