Quote:
Originally Posted by phma
The ongoing debate and reason for the anti sharia protestors is to focus attention on whether sharia law is compatible with secular forms of government, human rights, freedom of thought, and women's rights.
One of the objectives, and the main objective, of the anti-sharia protest is to separate the extremist view of Islam from other views considered less oppressive and nonviolent thus compatible with western society.
The objective of counter protestors is to prevent separation of the extremist view from Islam.
They seek acceptance of Islam as a whole, including the violence of extremist, and stiff-arm all notion that people have the mental capacity to decide what is harmful by branding them with islamophobia. They seek to promote Islam and welcoming the good with the bad will give terrorist a foothold for violence promoting the anarchy they seek to punish America for all its past sins.
To form an opinion one need look at where sharia law is practiced and decide that is the kind of law they want to live under or not.
|
Westerners believe they will be able to reform Islam
By integrating its members into the communities in which they migrate
As well as their submission to the laws of the countries in which they emigrated
But I believe that Islam can not be reformed
Because Islam is a system of thought and ideology and has strategic goals
The means of fraud and camouflage are used to reach their goals
They are many
Including encouragement and intimidation
And also the sex and marriage of more than one wife and the ease of divorce
The camouflage in Islam is called al-takea
This is the tactic used by Muslims in the land of freedom
It is a country that does not believe in Islam
The country of slavery is every country that believes in Islam
And to understand the intellectuals of the country of freedom these tactics
He must return to any constitution of an Islamic state
It contains the following article
Islam is the first source of laws
While the states of freedom
The constitution says people are the source of laws
There is therefore a difference in the source of laws between the countries of freedom and the country of slavery
I call every cultured country of freedom to explore the concept(al-hakemea)Governance
I mean the intellectual of liberal and democratic freedom
And this is in politics
In the rights of the woman there is a lot of speech and even in the faith
The attributes of God in Islam humiliate His Holiness
For God is the enemy of man
While in Christianity God loves man
Islam says that God is good
guileful
So there is a great difference in the intellectual system of the emigrant from the land of slavery to the land of freedom
The immigrant must choose
Between the laws of light and freedom
Or between the laws of slavery and darkness
He has the right to return to the Black Stone country and a grave that married his adopted wife's wife
It is characterized by spiritual teachings