Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2017, 09:27 AM
 
3,929 posts, read 2,957,987 times
Reputation: 6175

Advertisements

I have no problems with this. Statement or not. She is doing something that is perfectly natural. Feeding her kid. I never understood the uproar of a women feeding her kid in public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2017, 09:32 AM
 
36,588 posts, read 30,928,782 times
Reputation: 32920
Quote:
Originally Posted by spillerNburr View Post
That is total BS and you know it. There are places you can and can not do things. I don't want to see **** dumb woman take a dump while giving a speech. I don't want to see her pop her pimples while giving a speech or give birth either. She should not be breast feeding while doing her duty as an elected official. Nut bar women take this crap way too far just to try to prove some point that does not exist. I don't want to see them change tampons or any of the other things that there are private rooms for. This is stupidity taken to the extreme. You know damn well it is. that kid did not have to eat at that particular time. This is more leftist BS designed to push personal views on to other people who do not share those views. This is why you leftists have been loosing elections one after another.
No worries you dont have to. Doubt you will be in parliament.

As I understand Parliament passed a law allowing parents to attend to their young children for brief periods to make it more family friendly. In the past mothers would have to leave and proxy their vote.
Perhaps one day we as a society will move back to the future when the most natural act of breastfeeding and doing so in a public place does not cause people to have meltdowns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2017, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,742 posts, read 21,110,055 times
Reputation: 14266
Use of infant formula has been cited for numerous increased health risks. Studies have found infants in developed countries who consume formula are at increased risk for acute otitis media, gastroenteritis, severe lower respiratory tract infections, atopic dermatitis, asthma, obesity type 1 and 2 diabetes, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), eczema and necrotizing enterocolitis when compared to infants who are breastfed Some studies have found an association between infant formula and lower cognitive development, including iron supplementation in baby formula being linked to lowered I.Q. and other neurodevelopmental delaysOther health controversies[edit]
  • In 1985, Syntex Corporation was ordered to pay $27 million in compensation for the deaths of two American infants who suffered brain damage after drinking the company's baby formula, called Neo-mull-soy.
  • In 2003, baby formula manufactured by the German company Humana and sold in Israel under the brand Remedia caused severe vitamin deficiencies in babies. Babies who consumed the formula were hospitalized with cardiac and neurological symptoms. Three of them died, and at least twenty others were left with severe disabilities. An investigation revealed that the formula contained a much lower quantity of Thiamine than is needed for healthy infant development because of a manufacturing error. Humana's chief food technologist received a 30-month prison sentence for negligent manslaughter in February 2013 over the case.
  • In 2010, Abbott Laboratories issued a voluntary recall of about five million Similac brand powder infant formulas that were sold in the United States, Guam, Puerto Rico and some Caribbean countries. The recall was issued after the presence of a 'small common beetle' was detected in the product
  • In Canada, New Zealand and elsewhere, public concerns have been raised over the continued sale and marketing of soy-based formulae potentially containing high levels of phytoestrogens linked to abnormal child development including damage to babies' thyroid glands.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_formula
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top