Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,629 posts, read 10,383,806 times
Reputation: 19518

Advertisements

I think Hurricane Harvey's message has been there are many more good and kind people in this country who care about fellow Americans than there are malcontents and misanthropes.

https://twitter.com/MichaelBerrySho/...82716802265096

Last edited by texan2yankee; 08-31-2017 at 07:50 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,960 posts, read 22,139,830 times
Reputation: 13795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli34 View Post
I worded my response to you different in original post, because I see what you meant in terms of predictions of storms by NOAA (but it's not based on climate science, just like weather isn't, only a yearly forecast, based on short term conditions)) but it still doesn't dispute what scientists are predicting about how climate change will affect these storms in terms of making them more intense and unpredictable.

But no, climate scientists in general have not predicted more hurricanes, that's a false talking point created by deniers.
The thinking goes, that if you claim storms will be more intense then by that very logic, more tropical depressions will become a CAT 1 hurricane

National Academy of Sciences: Climate change to spawn more hurricanes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,228 posts, read 18,567,354 times
Reputation: 25798
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
I think Hurricane Harvey's message has been there are many more good and kind people in this country who care about fellow Americans than there are malcontents and misanthropes.

I concur. The response by government agencies (local, state, Fed) has been excellent. Also, the response from fellow American citizens has also been superb. Let's recognize the positives for once.


Man Made Climate Change is still a theory that many want to use to increase taxes, and fees on fossil fuel energy use. We already give enough money to government. This is an economy killer. Fossil fuel, by far, still powers the Earth. In the U.S. we have vast supplies of Natural Gas, Oil, and Coal. We should use that to keep us energy independent. Wind, and solar are still a JOKE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,233 posts, read 26,182,129 times
Reputation: 15627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
The temperature of the water did not affect the amount of rainfall as much as the circulation pattern of Harvey itself. As the air passed over the gulf it picked up as much moisture as the air could hold. The winds whipping up the gulf into choppy waves helped. Then the moisture dropped on land because there was too much for the air to hold without more gulf water and waves to feed it. Anybody who does not live near the Gulf but has visited it in the summer notices how humid the air is in that region. Do you think it would not be even more humid over the Gulf itself?

By the time the air moved around to the west and back over the gulf again, it was drier and had more potential for sucking more water out of the gulf. Rinse repeat for about 5 days and you get record rainfall.

Most major floods anywhere in the country were the result of stalled systems dumping more water than the ground could hold. As long as there were weather patterns that fed moisture into the system, the rain kept falling. You will sometimes see major rainfall in West Virginia with storms that are continuously being fed with moisture from the Gulf of Mexico. It depends on how the winds are blowing.
The amount of moisture in Harvey was a direct result of warmer Oceans, the Gulf of Mexico warmed by around 2 Deg F over the last few decades. Higher ocean temperatures mean more moisture is present in these tropical depressions. There is a natural variability in climate, some systems stall while others move on but the amount of moisture is dramatically increasing in these types of events. A few inches of rain used to be significant, South Florida around Cape Coral just got close to 20 inches.


When Hurricane Matthew moved over North Carolina and went inland it also dropped 20 inches and caused massive destruction and it was moving rather rapidly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,082,296 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The amount of moisture in Harvey was a direct result of warmer Oceans, the Gulf of Mexico warmed by around 2 Deg F over the last few decades. Higher ocean temperatures mean more moisture is present in these tropical depressions. There is a natural variability in climate, some systems stall while others move on but the amount of moisture is dramatically increasing in these types of events. A few inches of rain used to be significant, South Florida around Cape Coral just got close to 20 inches.


When Hurricane Matthew moved over North Carolina and went inland it also dropped 20 inches and caused massive destruction and it was moving rather rapidly.
Imagine if the storms in FL and NC had stalled like Harvey did. Do you think the rainfall amounts would have been less? I think they would have been more comparable to what Harvey dropped. You cannot keep ignoring the fact that Harvey stalled in pretty much one place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,278 posts, read 14,894,337 times
Reputation: 10369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wells5 View Post
The Gulf of Mexico must have been mighty hot in the year of 1900. That's when the Galveston Flood killed at least 6000 people and possibly up to 12,000. Hurricane winds reached 145 miles an hour.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11pjSTnl99Q


So, you don't understand the impact of the industrial revolution on climate change? That is at the heart of it!

And you don't understand the difference between weather and climate?

Before you deny deny deny, please try to read up on what scientists are telling us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:51 AM
 
3,851 posts, read 2,225,030 times
Reputation: 3127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
I have thousands of peer-reviewed academic journals on my side.
Don't pretend that you have read thousands of peer-reviewed academic journals. Almost none of the most ardent global warming alarmists have ever read anything or done any research, nor are they qualified to have an opinion on the subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:56 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,681,396 times
Reputation: 1962
Default The Houston Hurriance is climate change?

No major hurricanes hit the US in 9 years and for 9 years it was quite from the liberals and climate change people who were so convinced this was the ticket to getting people to believe them was hurricanes were stronger etc etc etc. Hurricanes are not stronger more people live in these areas causing more destruction and we have a cable news network.

Now if you put any major storm in texas, or new orleans they are terrible in dealing with water, because of the way the states are below sea level and or flat. In 1600 if nobody lived there do you know what would have happened a few trees would be missing and that is it and nobody would care. Because we have millions of people living there and 24/7 coverage on hurricanes climate changers are busy at work telling us the world is ending and we need green credits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,278 posts, read 14,894,337 times
Reputation: 10369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atalanta View Post
This has been happening on the planet Earth since it began. Science has shown the changes on earth. It is a living planet.

Just because the egotistical human race thinks this is the biggest in history does not mean that it is.

I believe humans are carelessly and negatively impacting and polluting the earth and messing with the circle of life.
But natural disasters is what this earth has and will continue to do.

Once instance rising sea levels may be happening is that we have active plates. And mountains are still forming by plates moving and colliding pushing up, this a mountain. That land that I pushed up in some areas fills in with water. Rising the sea level.

What you say is not in dispute, but please don't confuse the ignorant by mixing the two ideas. Plate tectonics is a very slow process. Of course we've always had natural disasters and it is a living planet.

So let's not kill it.
This quote of yours is true and can and should be changed....

"I believe humans are carelessly and negatively impacting and polluting the earth and messing with the circle of life."

Look at the charts showing the rise in CO2 over this century and ever since man has been burning fossil fuels. This is indisputable.

This is what Harvey indicates and this is what we should be looking at in terms of lessons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2017, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,278 posts, read 14,894,337 times
Reputation: 10369
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerGeek40 View Post
LOL
We have what, 200 years of data on this stuff, but the planet has been here for billions of years.
As much as our arrogant left wants to believe otherwise.....we know almost nothing about what is happening. Maybe the planet is warming up. Maybe the storms are related. Maybe they are not.
12 years between any major storm activity. Some of those years.....we had no hurricanes at all.
WE.DON'T.KNOW.
You don't seem to know but the scientists do. Look up how these trends are measured - in one instance- by ice cores at the poles.

Yes, the planet has changed over geological time and epochs- this is NOT THE ISSUE. Look at what has been happening rapidly in this century!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top