Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:14 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,659,410 times
Reputation: 4784

Advertisements

Where we really need a wall: maybe the Federal government and the Army Corps of Engineers could provide the money and manpower to construct some protective walls and surge barriers, strengthen the bayou systems and dams, to protect Houston in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,792,370 times
Reputation: 20674
Or maybe businesses and people could choose to relocate to places less prone to natural disasters instead of expecting the Federal Government to make operating/ living in swampland better, till the next big one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Pacific Beach/San Diego
4,750 posts, read 3,571,220 times
Reputation: 4614
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Or maybe businesses and people could choose to relocate to places less prone to natural disasters instead of expecting the Federal Government to make operating/ living in swampland better, till the next big one.
You could say the same thing about living near the border then too - - relocate and don't build an impractical and ineffective wall at the border.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,649 posts, read 10,410,318 times
Reputation: 19557
The voters via the electoral college voted for a Southern Wall between the US and Mexico by electing Donald Trump. While your suggestion is interesting, the wall you propose wasn't on the ballot in 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:38 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,456,666 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Or maybe businesses and people could choose to relocate to places less prone to natural disasters instead of expecting the Federal Government to make operating/ living in swampland better, till the next big one.
You nailed it here. I've been saying this for years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:43 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,659,410 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Or maybe businesses and people could choose to relocate to places less prone to natural disasters instead of expecting the Federal Government to make operating/ living in swampland better, till the next big one.
I'd hazard a guess that between flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, severe winter weather, droughts ---- much of the U.S. is prone to severe weather and also the risk of natural disasters.

For example, most of Florida is at sea level and at high risk of flooding, or being obliterated if sea levels continue to rise with global warming.

Also, there is no place in North America that could get over 50 inches of rain in a couple of days and not flood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,799,673 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Where we really need a wall: maybe the Federal government and the Army Corps of Engineers could provide the money and manpower to construct some protective walls and surge barriers, strengthen the bayou systems and dams, to protect Houston in the future.
The dams and levees held just fine. This isn't like NOLA during Katrina, where all the levees that were decades old and sorely falling short had failed.

Houston may need to raise their damns another few feet, but this was a once in a millennia storm and took the record for dropping the most rain in the history of tracking such things. You simply can't build every city to withstand such rare storms.

If that is your fear, then people should move off the coasts where such storms will never land. AZ, NV, NM, CO, ID, all of the plains states, where you'll exchange hurricanes for tornadoes.

The weather is the weather.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
For example, most of Florida is at sea level and at high risk of flooding, or being obliterated if sea levels continue to rise with global warming.

Also, there is no place in North America that could get over 50 inches of rain in a couple of days and not flood.
You are exactly right. There is no area on earth that wouldn't flood with 50+ inches of rain in just 4 days.

The sea rise is just 1.8mm a year, so roughly 6 inches a century. It has been rising for more than 2000 years because we have been in an extended warm period. It'll flip the other way, just as it always has.

Last edited by steven_h; 08-30-2017 at 11:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:45 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,335 posts, read 54,455,929 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
The voters via the electoral college voted for a Southern Wall between the US and Mexico by electing Donald Trump. While your suggestion is interesting, the wall you propose wasn't on the ballot in 2016.
You mean they voted for a Southern Wall PAID FOR by Mexico, right? Have at it as soon as those Pesos start rolling in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:47 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,659,410 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
You mean they voted for a Southern Wall PAID FOR by Mexico, right? Have at it as soon as those Pesos start rolling in.
BTW Mexico is one of the countries that has offered to assist Texas with hurricane and flood relief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,954 posts, read 30,307,663 times
Reputation: 19205
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Or maybe businesses and people could choose to relocate to places less prone to natural disasters instead of expecting the Federal Government to make operating/ living in swampland better, till the next big one.
I agree, there are certain places that shouldn't be developed.

However, I will state this, in the Bahamas, they build their homes with nothing but Concrete Block, and they actually withstand only water damage...so maybe as people re-buid, they should visit alternatives.

I saw an ocean front home make it thru one of the worst hurricanes, with nothing but water damage and roof repairs....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top