Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wait. So Manafort's ties to Russia go back 11 years, and your logic is that instead of looking into all that activity, they should just end the investigation instead. Sure, bro'. I'm sure they'll get right on that.
Wait. So Manafort's ties to Russia go back 11 years, and your logic is that instead of looking into all that activity, they should just end the investigation instead. Sure, bro'. I'm sure they'll get right on that.
No, they have to keep going back to find something. If they found it already they wouldn't need to keep digging. So what if they find something from over a decade ago? What does that have to do with Trump in 2016/17?
Just looking for some indiscretion they could then use to force manafort to 'confess'.
An inconsistency in his testimony is as good as be convicted of a crime for which the government has no evidence. The martha stewart style prosecution.
What is so different here is that in court, previous crimes or arrests are not allowed to be referenced as it prejudices the current charge.
Apparently the spec pros is not contrained in seeking justice the way we know justice is meted out. that is disturbing as it mimics social justice media trials where a paula dean can admit to using a banned word in a private conversation, a decade ago, and be judged a racist and lose her job.
The blindfold justice used to wear is now for sale on ebay, with a buy it now price.
It is not fishing, it is a targeted investigation into a series of allegations ref the 2016 election, Russian meddling and the extent to which Team Trump colluded and aided Putin in his vindictive attack on Hillary and the US.
No, they have to keep going back to find something. If they found it already they wouldn't need to keep digging. So what if they find something from over a decade ago? What does that have to do with Trump in 2016/17?
Precisely.
Much like Sargent Shultz on Hogan's Heroes..... they know nothing. They have nothing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
