Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So I guess by that math, Obama actually ran a surplus?
By any math, Bill Clinton had a budget surplus several years there.
But water under the bridge. Enough about Obama and Clinton, this thread is about how Trump seems to believe that Wall Street types making bank offsets the National Debt.
Remember when Trump was promoting "renegotiating" the national debt like he used to "renegotiate" his loans, i.e. telling lenders that they are only going to get twenty cents on the dollar.
This suggests if Clinton and Obama had actually been able to do what they wanted the debt wouldn't be where it is -- not sure how accurate it is.
The only way to pay down debt, increase revenues and cut costs. Even having a balanced budget won't pay down the debt. It will continue to grow exponentially until more money comes in then goes out.
That's the main argument AGAINST tax cuts and FOR program cuts.
When the economy grows, more taxes are collected which offset the debt. He is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome
So why did the debt grow under Obama with the tremendous economic growth during that period?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome
You need to read the post I was responding to.
Sorry. Misunderstood your point.
The debt grows when budgets run a deficit.
Because the nation was recovering from a financial meltdown and supporting a couple pointless wars, the budget was in deficit during Obama's terms.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.