Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2017, 10:26 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,979,511 times
Reputation: 1906

Advertisements

yeah, we all know HRC used her position as SOS to pad her foundation. The evidence is probably hiding out alongside all the evidence that Trump individually colluded with Russia...


This story is going to be buried so deep, so fast...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2017, 10:27 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Seriously ...? This has been discussed numerous times here.

If you need a refresher, here you go.

The Clinton Foundation received millions from investors as Putin took over 20% of US uranium deposits

Here’s the high-level summary. There are more details below.

• Canadian company Uranium One owned uranium mines in the US and Kazakhstan.

• Uranium One's mines account for 20% of the uranium mined in the US. Uranium is used for nuclear weapons, and it's considered a strategic asset to the US.

• Russia’s state-owned atomic agency, Rosatom, bought a 17% stake in Uranium One in June 2009.

• The Russian atomic agency decided it wanted to own 51% of Uranium One in June 2010. To take a majority stake in Uranium One, it needed approval from a special committee that included the State Department, which Hillary Clinton led at the time.

• Investors in Uranium One gave money to the Clinton Foundation starting in 2005 and through 2011. On June 29, 2010, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 to speak in Russia by an investment bank with ties to Russia's government that had a buy rating on Uranium One’s stock. In addition, Hillary held no veto power over those deals but that's just a pesky fact, eh?

• In January 2013, despite assurances to the contrary, a subsidiary of Rosatom took over 100% of the company and delisted it from the Toronto Stock Exchange.

• Clinton was required to disclose all of her foundation's contributors before she became secretary of state, but the Clintons did not disclose millions of dollars donated by the chairman of Uranium One while the review of the deal was ongoing.

Blah, blah, blah..............................

Now show evidence those involved held an export license for that uranium or explain just how Moscow "controlled a large swath(a nebulous BS term if there ever was one)" of that uranium without the existence of that license?

Or, just refute:http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinto...m-russia-deal/

Last edited by burdell; 10-17-2017 at 10:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 10:57 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
7,444 posts, read 7,018,386 times
Reputation: 4601
Default So finally a Russian collusion story breaks with actual evidence but it involves

The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton rather than Trump and the 2016 election:

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow | TheHill

"The Obama administration’s decision to approve Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One has been a source of political controversy since 2015.

That’s when conservative author Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

The Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions at the time, insisting there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for any member of the committee to oppose the Uranium One deal.

But FBI, Energy Department and court documents reviewed by The Hill show the FBI in fact had gathered substantial evidence well before the committee’s decision that Vadim Mikerin — the main Russian overseeing Putin’s nuclear expansion inside the United States — was engaged in wrongdoing starting in 2009."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 10:58 AM
 
Location: In The Thin Air
12,566 posts, read 10,620,001 times
Reputation: 9247
Oh crap. Obama should be impeached! Oh wait...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 11:00 AM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 29 days ago)
 
27,651 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
Why did the fbi cover for the most corrupt administration in history?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 11:02 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,446,965 times
Reputation: 6960
This is part of the reason they made up the story about Trump colluding because they knew since HRC lost, things like this would eventually surface so they tried to "get out in front" of this by making up the Trump Russia story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Oops looks bad for the corrupt democrats, once again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 11:06 AM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 29 days ago)
 
27,651 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Blah, blah, blah..............................

Now show evidence those involved held an export license for that uranium or explain just how Moscow "controlled a large swath(a nebulous BS term if there ever was one)" of that uranium without the existence of that license?

Or, just refute:Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?
Blah blah
Snopes? Seriously? Smh,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 11:07 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,979,511 times
Reputation: 1906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmyy View Post
Oh crap. Obama should be impeached! Oh wait...
So its a joke when Obama/HRC collude with Russia (allegedly) but a major fiasco when Trump may have (allegedly)?? Sounds about right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2017, 11:07 AM
 
3,500 posts, read 2,788,649 times
Reputation: 2154
It's fake news. Stop trusting everything you read.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top