Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The lengths people will go to try to defend someone who, for all intents and purposes, admitted to molesting a underage kids is astounding. nononsenseguy and chucknsee are actually defending Moore more vehemently than he or his legal team are.
Despite being one of two people who would actually know, Moore never denied signing that yearbook. His lawyer wouldn’t definitively claim forgery, but only said it should be submitted to a handwriting expert- just enough to trigger doubt in weak and tribal minds, but not enough to trigger liability for slander. Yet here we have several CD posters adamantly advocating for someone who diddled underage girls. Just astounding.
Here is one analysis of Moore's "signature" in the yearbook, compared with his actual signature. It's so obviously NOT his signature. It is not only a forgery, it's a very poor forgery:
Here is one analysis of Moore's "signature" in the yearbook, compared with his actual signature. It's so obviously NOT his signature. It is not only a forgery, it's a very poor forgery:
Here is one analysis of Moore's "signature" in the yearbook, compared with his actual signature. It's so obviously NOT his signature. It is not only a forgery, it's a very poor forgery:
Here is one analysis of Moore's "signature" in the yearbook, ....
WOW.
random internet guy ( caiden cowger ) who lists no qualifications in handwriting analysis looks at two signatures separated by 40 years and notices some minor differences....... and you sincerely believe that's proof of forgery?
random internet guy ( caiden cowger ) who lists no qualifications in handwriting analysis looks at two signatures separated by 40 years and notices some minor differences....... and you sincerely believe that's proof of forgery?
It's raw, unfiltered desperation as Trumplings see their right wing fantasy world starting to unravel.
If you knew anything about handwriting analysis you would conclude with a cursory examination that both writings are nearly identical.
Yup. I studied handwriting analysis for a while as a hobby, and the initial strokes of a signature typically have flourishes that don't change as much over time as the rest of the letters. Sometimes a person's hand changes radically over time, but most of the time, the changes are gradual.
The one thing that was very noticeable was how little Moore's signature had changed over 40 years. He seems to also have a strong preference for the same kind of pen as well, which is also fairly unusual.
As a D.A. and a judge, there should be many exemplars of his signature, and they should be easy to find because they're all part of public records. A good analysis uses many signatures, not just one, to compare. Time, small accidents that occur when writing, the condition of the writing tool, and even the time of day can all influence signatures.
A signature on a form is typically different in small ways than one that is written on blank space. Signing on the line does affect the way a person writes.
This whole thing was a failed red herring, and Moore's lawyer was a fool for pushing it. I'm just an amateur; anyone who is an expert would dismiss the possibility of forgery in a split second, and would have a dozen sound reasons that could be explained for the dismissal.
Apparently women who worked at the mall in Gadsden when they were teens recall how unpleasant and creepy Roy Moore was. They reportedly drew straws to determine who would have to deal with him. One girl who worked at Sears even tried to hide when he was around. As more stories emerge, the people are getting a fuller picture of this predator creep. Disgusting.
Right, and this just adds to why it cannot be overlooked. Those who think these claims are just made up are refusing to see the obviousness of it all.
That’s true. Although sanctimonious hypocrisy does have a home with many right wing evangelicals (ie support of Trump). Franken should be investigated but, at the moment, his alleged misdeeds are nowhere near those alleged of Moore or even Trump for that matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggunsmallbrains
So you equate that pesky photo with attempted rape of a minor?
Right...I am a female and it seems that he was "joking around for the camera" in a moment, on the way home, after having worked together for a while. I am not saying it was not poor judgement. As far as what the woman claims of him kissing her during show rehearsal, well, no.. that does not sound appropriate, seemed impulsive and was unwelcomed. At least he unhesitatingly responded with an apology, unlike others having had multiple, highly-offensive claims of, who are otherwise obviously dishonest and disgusting individuals in nature, besides.
I am not excusing any unwanted, negative male behavior, however, Mr. Franken as a person does not appear to be anything close, in any way, to those he is being lumped together with, so this is bothersome.
I have to say, I have only seen this accuser speak a couple of times now, but find there is something that feels non-genuine about her, unlike many females who I have seen tell their stories.
Last edited by In2itive_1; 11-16-2017 at 08:04 PM..
Reason: Addition of quote.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
