Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's already been shown to be his assistant's initials by the Divorce Decree document from which the signature was copied.
nobody is arguing that the "/DA" on the divorce papers are moore's assistant's initials.
what your arguing is that "DA" on the yearbook can ONLY represent the assistant's initials and can't be the common abbreviation of "district attorney".
the claim that the yearbook signature is copied from the divorce papers is contradicted by the fact that the "DA" are not similar and the large middle initial "S" is missing from the signature.
It's a fake, that's why there is no middle initial and the "D.A." was written because whoever faked it thought the "D.A." meant "District Attorney." "D.A." are the initials of his assistant.
But you're convinced he signed the yearbook, so nothing will convince you otherwise.
Carry on.
I’m saying there are 2 possibilities. You aren’t. There are weird things about both.
You think a forger wouldn’t notice/copy a big ol middle initial right there?
The poll I saw also said 36% want to wait for a Senate investigation before deciding. Only 33% favor him resigning now.
The better question for a Minnesota poll is: 'If you knew a Republican who supported Trump would replace Franken, would you favor Franken resigning ?' That question with the parties reversed is closer to the reality in Alabama --- if not Moore, they get an anti-Trump D.
You have it backwards. If Franken stayed in with his horrible approval numbers and somehow won the Dem primary then you would have the same thing.
Both parties are deplorable to paraphrase the hillmeister. The amount of brainwashing both parties have done to keep their minions in line is astonishing. Just reading some of these posts prove it.
If it's not a fake, why won't Ms. Allred release the yearbook as requested so that it may be examined by an expert?
this has been discussed repeatedly in this thread.
1: allred has offered to turn over the book to any house/senate investigation.
2: handwriting analysis is not an exact science, it's subjective opinion. no independent analysis has been promoted by either side.
Quote:
If it's not a fake, why are the signatures so dissimilar?
they're not. in fact moore's signature has remained remarkably consistent over the long period of time ( the one big difference is the addition of the middle initial "S" ).
I’m just glad that Lee Busby is mounting a write-in challenge as a conservative alternative. If the “value voters” of Alabama want a non-creepy alternative to Roy Moore, here is their chance. Vote Lee Busby.
If it's not a fake, why won't Ms. Allred release the yearbook as requested so that it may be examined by an expert?
If it's not a fake, why are the signatures so dissimilar?
"Why doesn't he just release the long form and make all this go away?"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
