Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not dodging anything. The onus is on YOU to come back with a quote that says there are NO consequences.
You are dodging. You asked me for a quote from Jesus, and I gave it to you.
Quote:
You provided me with evidence of nothing. And I never said the Gospel's weren't in the New Testament. Please point out where I said that. That's called a fallacy.
Your words...not mine - "No, you didn't give me a quote from the Gospel. You gave me a quote from the New Testament" See....I DID give you a quite from the gospels.
Quote:
If you have to resort to fallacies to "prove" your point, you already lost. There is no point in continuing this conversation as you will continue to perpetuate your misguided beliefs without producing any evidence.
I didn't resort to fallacies to prove any point. If anything, I gave you nothing but EVERYTHING that is generally accepted christian beliefs. YOU, on the other hand, refuse to give me what I asked for.
Her opinion was that it proved the accusers were lying.
The Fact Is That the handwriting on the yearbook has been proved to be forged by Gloria (dem operative).
No it hasn’t been proven. You can say you think it is for reasons, but there has not been an independent assessment as to whether it is or not. (And no, there isn’t just one explanation for why it isn’t just being automatically released)
This article provided nothing new for either side. To say it does is silly. You can believe his opinion, but that doesn’t prove anything either way.
Mo Brooks also said we should never trust Trump before. Would you listen to him?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
Another Alabama Republican had an opinion? Well, I'm convinced. What could possibly motivate her to be anything but 100% truthful?
That out of the way: Are you instructed to put a big fat lie as a headline, or is that something you thought up on your own?
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria
How is this proof of anything either direction?
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria
How, based on this article? I don’t see any indications of new insights, anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria
No it hasn’t been proven. You can say you think it is for reasons, but there has not been an independent assessment as to whether it is or not. (And no, there isn’t just one explanation for why it isn’t just being automatically released)
This article provided nothing new for either side. To say it does is silly. You can believe his opinion, but that doesn’t prove anything either way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA
Hmmmm...I see zero proof in the link of anything.
It's is as much proof as the initial reports of the allegations that Moore was guilty of abuse - and you guys had NO problems believing that.
I think the poster got paid by a sock puppet organization to post that title. Why else? Post enough time and a few more of those dolts that believe this stuff will have it posted on their Facebook accounts and it will be believed as fact. It's that simple to play them.
Do you see that this article adds nothing really to either side? If Mo had said “I know he didn’t do it, I was there!” that’s something new, true or not. Then we can think why didn’t you volunteer anything, were you there, etc. It’s at least some sort of thing that can help prove truth or not.
This article, however, was just the opinion of someone else saying “I don’t think he did it” and rehashing stuff we’ve heard.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324
Her opinion was that it proved the accusers were lying.
The Fact Is That the handwriting on the yearbook has been proved to be forged by Gloria (dem operative).
I looked this up because I heard this claim before.
The only one claiming the signature is forged is the Moore team(specifically, his attorney), not anyone independent.
The Moore camp also claimed that Mrs Nelson had met Moore in her 1999 divorce case because he was a district judge and he would have been the one she had to go to, but that isnt true either.
IM not sure of the judicial system in other states, but all Alabama court districts on that level have 3 judges which all rotate with in areas of the district, Roy Moore was assigned to a different location and court documents show that her divorce judge was W.D. Russell. Apparently Moore had been assigned to that area of the district for the previous 4 months, but was rotated to another area of the district about 3 weeks before she filed.
back to the main point, why would you argue that the word of the defendants attorney is fact ??? Dont get me wrong, if you agree with Moore, then you assume its true on his part, but you seemed to actually be arguing as if it had been proven.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
