"Gun control" advocates push for "just a little more restriction" and then just a little more after that. Really? MERGED (politician, government)

[Mike930]

Originally Posted by NY_refugee87

Last I checked, the 2nd Amendment and Bill of Rights declared differently.

Nor did I see a tragedy clause that dictates when a tragedy occurs these articles become toilet paper.

Matter of fact that 308 AR I built for her was more accurate than a Remington 700 and any other bolt action "hunting" rifle. It shot a speed roughly 3/16ths of an inch opposed to an inch or greater at 100 yards.

Say what bureaucracy declares needs by the way? Or is it of your supercilious anointed and subjective interpretation of need?

By the way they make ARs chambered in 30-06 and 300 win mag too

I didn’t say you weren’t allowed to have it, I said didn’t NEED. And yes, it’s my supercilious anointed and subjective interpretation of need.

And no, you really don’t need it. Not really.

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by Mike930

I didn’t say you weren’t allowed to have it, I said didn’t NEED.

TRANSLATION: I'm trying to sway people's opinions with irrelevancies and arrogant assumptions, so that they will vote to ban guns when I think they are sufficienty fooled.

[Mike930]

Originally Posted by North Beach Person

You did noticed he mentioned one chambered in .308?

You ever hog hunted? Or coyote?

I have.

As a note, I don't own an AR platform rifle. I tend towards shotguns. Some of which, the semiautos, will be the next ones on your, and others, list to be banned.

Then will be pump actions.

Is this one OK for you?
BAR Mark II Safari 100th Anniversary

I’m really not anti gun. As soon as I get out of the hell that is California I intend to buy a handgun for me and one for my wife.

I just don’t see the need for assault weapons in the hands of civilians. Just my opinion.

[NY_refugee87]

Originally Posted by Mike930

I didn’t say you weren’t allowed to have it, I said didn’t NEED. And yes, it’s my supercilious anointed and subjective interpretation of need.

And no, you really don’t need it. Not really.

Strange. I don't recall having to express a need to justify purchase of any property.

You sure you're a conservative? Liberals like to declare subjective interpretation of need.

Here's one more for you, it's cheaper to build an AR platform than a bolt action.

I like flintlock to full auto.

[NY_refugee87]

Hey look Mike! A black powder AR!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=q7Md96CpsDI

[Speleothem]

Originally Posted by Mike930

You can get the same results with a 30-06 or 308. You don’t need an AR-15.

There's that word again.
It ain't the "Bill of Needs."
I don't even own a rifle (but for a Marlin 60),
but you don't get to tell me what I "need."

They'll ban everything, one at a time, until
you may only carry a revolver with one bullet
in your shirt pocket. Still won't stop violence.

[NY_refugee87]

Originally Posted by Mike930

I’m really not anti gun. As soon as I get out of the hell that is California I intend to buy a handgun for me and one for my wife.

I just don’t see the need for assault weapons in the hands of civilians. Just my opinion.

No stay in California where you belong with the rest who share your sentiment.

[le roi]

Originally Posted by NY_refugee87

They're good for hogs.

So are AKs.

you could kill a hog with an M249 but that doesn't make it a hunting rifle.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by le roi

We've never actually banned assault weapons. You can still buy them very easily.

There was legislation in the 90's that some people referred to as an "assault weapons ban," but that was not its purpose and referring to it as such is misinformation.




The confiscation doesn't need to be "ruthless," as long as people abide by the law it'll be fine.



This isn't true, either.

The truth is what you are talking about isn't an assault weapon.

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by Mike930

I’m really not anti gun. As soon as I get out of the hell that is California I intend to buy a handgun for me and one for my wife.

I just don’t see the need for assault weapons in the hands of civilians. Just my opinion.

We can't buy assault weapons.


FYI this guy doesn't speak for the rest of us here.