Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
By that definition, 1 percent of women surveyed reported being raped in the previous year, a figure that suggests that 1.3 million American women annually may be victims of rape or attempted rape.
That figure is significantly higher than previous estimates. The Department of Justice estimated that 188,380 Americans were victims of sexual violence last year. Only 84,767 assaults defined as forcible rapes were reported in 2010, according to national statistics from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Both parties have plenty of perverts. I'm of the opinion that someone has to be amoral or immoral to want to be a politician at any level above local government (and even that is questionable). This question has to do if one of the two main parties is more likely to tolerate or defend its perverts.
From my perspective on the right, it seems to me that Republicans have a knee-jerk tendency to toss out any suspected pervert with or without evidence. Larry Craig, Bob Packwood,etc. are shown the door almost immediately. Hell, Larry Craig was engaging in a celebrated Democrat activity. On the other hand, Democrats have tolerated Bill "Riding Dirty" Clinton, Hillary Clinton's personal destruction of women Clinton has abused, Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd's waitress sandwiches, Joe "Handsy" Biden, JFK, RFK, and the list goes on.
Curious how everyone sees it. To be fair, the Republicans do tout themselves as the party of family values, so it would make sense that hey have to be mindful of perverts for that reason. Democrats are the anti-family values party, so it would make sense that they would be a bit more tolerant of perverts.
It doesn't seem like this is so much a question as it is an guise to talk crap about Democrats (again)
If you can't see the difference you are delusional. There is photographic proof of Al Franken SEXUALLY ASSAULTING a woman. And a sleeping, completely defenseless woman at that. So, yes, other allegations against him become more credible based on the prior documented evidence. Had that creep merely had allegations against him that were not corroborated in any way, I already explained in another post how I'd treat the situation.
You have a confession from Donald Trump admitting he's dine far worse than grab **** over a flak jacket.
Oh and there's the fact that Trump has 16 WOMEN CLAIMING HE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED THEM
Another accuser dated him for a period of time AFTER he supposedly assaulted her. He eventually dumped her when he met his wife.
You've found more details on another of the four we're dismissing bc of your b.s. stat that 10%of womenare making up their stories. That leaves 12 who odds say are telling the truth about the time Donald Trump SEXUALLY ASSAULTED THEM
Other than his admission that he SEXUALLY ASSAULTS WOMEN bc he's rich & famous, you mean
Trump said:
Quote:
And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Is English not your first language? Should I explain the word "let" to you?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
