Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What do you think they were there talking and debating about?!? I must say you are an expert in the art of selective hearing and the "trigger" word drop game. But that's all you have for this thread, because you know you can't actually bring anything of substance to the floor.
They were his words. "I don't know what they are protesting about". He does so. He doesn't want to acknowledge what they are protesting about. One that can be honest can not make a good argument.
Yes, they protested in Baltimore. A city lead by black Democrats. From there he can only ramble.
Black on Black homicide rate. 89%
White on white homicide rate. 81%
2015 statistics 2,380 black murder by other black, 2,574 whites murdered by other whites. But blacks are only 13% of the population while whites are 63%. over 4 1/2 times as many whites as black.
1. Set up a strawman that no rational person would defend (Looting and burning cars)
2. Set up a fallacious argument with "alternative facts"
3. When challenged on fake facts, demand that challenger prove you wrong
1. Set up a strawman that no rational person would defend (Looting and burning cars)
2. Set up a fallacious argument with "alternative facts"
3. When challenged on fake facts, demand that challenger prove you wrong
They did defend it by trying to rationalize it, which was even mentioned by Ben Shapiro. They (government of Baltimore) even set the stage for the looting and burning (not only cars, but buildings too). The mayor said the police should give the people space to destroy and rationalized it. If anything, Shapiro minimized the reality of what they did in Baltimore.
They did defend it by trying to rationalize it, which was even mentioned by Ben Shapiro. They (government of Baltimore) even set the stage for the looting and burning (not only cars, but buildings too). The mayor said the police should give the people space to destroy and rationalized it. If anything, Shapiro minimized the reality of what they did in Baltimore.
He wasn't debating the mayor, he was debating the people on stage and not one of them defended rioting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68
And what fake facts? Are his statistics wrong?
13% of the population is responsible for 50% of the murders in the USA
So 40 million americans are either murderers or accessories to murders??
Really? You're going to stand for that straight up lie.
They were his words. "I don't know what they are protesting about". He does so. He doesn't want to acknowledge what they are protesting about. One that can be honest can not make a good argument.
Yes, they protested in Baltimore. A city lead by black Democrats. From there he can only ramble.
He wasn't debating the mayor, he was debating the people on stage and not one of them defended rioting.
13% of the population is responsible for 50% of the murders in the USA
So 40 million americans are either murderers or accessories to murders??
Really? You're going to stand for that straight up lie.
Ben Shapiro is either an idiot or a liar
yet you have no proof. Oddly enough Shapiro didn't do the following but you just did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slats Grobnick
How to win a debate
1. Set up a strawman that no rational person would defend (Looting and burning cars)
2. Set up a fallacious argument with "alternative facts"
3. When challenged on fake facts, demand that challenger prove you wrong
lol. You can't make this stuff up
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.